Positive
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Many people assume that apart from the Bible, history is silent concerning Jesus of Nazareth.


Testimony from the Romans

Cornelius Tacitus (ca. 56-120) was a Roman senator, councilor and governor of the Roman province of Anatolia (covering most of modern-day Turkey) as well as one of ancient Rome's greatest historians.

No friend to either Nero or Christians, Tacitus writes that Nero blamed "a class hated for their abominations, called Christians by the populace." He goes on to explain that "Christus [Christ], from whom the name had its origin, suffered the extreme penalty [crucifixion] during the reign of Tiberius at the hand of one of our procurators, Pontius Pilatus.

A contemporary of Tacitus, Caius Suetonius Tranquillus (ca. 69-140), overseer of Rome's libraries and court official to several emperors, writes that the emperor Claudius "banished the Jews from Rome, who were continually making disturbances, Chrestus [Christ] being their leader". This banishment of Jews from Rome is mentioned in Acts 18:2.

Also, "Pliny the younger, the Roman legate of Bithynia-Pontus (what is now north-central Turkey) in the early second century, wrote to the emperor Trajan, requesting advice on how to deal with Christians who refused to reverence Caesar's image. Pliny noted that these Christians met regularly and sang hymns 'to Christ as if to a god' (Letters 10:96.7). The phrase 'as if to a God' suggests that Pliny knew Jesus had been a person who had lived on earth but was reluctant to call him divine" (Craig Blomberg, The Historical Reliability of the Gospels, 1987, p. 196).

Testimony from Josephus

Flavius Josephus, a prominent Jewish historian of the first century, is well known to historians and scholars. Born into a priestly family in A.D. 37,
Josephus twice mentions Jesus in his monumental work, Antiquities of the Jews, written A.D. 90-95. His most extensive quote reads:

"Now, there was about this time Jesus, a wise man, if it be lawful to call him a man, for he was a doer of wonderful works,—a teacher of such men as received the truth with pleasure. He drew over to him both many of the Jews, and many of the Gentiles. He was [the] Christ; and when Pilate, at the suggestion of the principal men amongst us, had condemned him to the cross, those that loved him at the first did not forsake him, for he appeared to them alive again the third day, as the divine prophets had foretold these and ten thousand other wonderful things concerning him.

A second mention of Jesus by Josephus, is seldom disputed by scholars. It concerns the martyrdom of James, His half brother: "Festus was now dead, and Albinus was but upon the road; so he assembled the sanhedrin of the judges, and brought before them the brother of Jesus, who was called Christ. James, and some others [or some of his companions;] and when he had formed an accusation against them as breakers of the law, he delivered them to be stoned ..." (Antiquities, 20:9:1).

Although Josephus was never a Christian, in his works we find mention of many other figures from the Gospels and other New Testament books. These include the family of the Herods; the Judean procurators and members of the high priestly families. His books, like the writings of the Roman historians and officials, provide powerful independent historical accuracy of the Gospels and the existence of Jesus Christ.


LadyGrace · 70-79
@jshm2 Jesus was a very popular name and he was a very popular person in his day. Every time people heard he was coming to their town, great crowds gathered to hear him and see his miracles.

We call the Hebrew hero of Jericho,Joshua,and the Christian Messiah,Jesus, because the New Testament was originally written in Greek, not Hebrew or Aramaic. Greeks did not use the soundsh, so the evangelists substituted anSsound. Then, to make it a masculine name, they added anotherSsound at the end. The earliest written version of the name Jesus was Romanized asIesous. (Thus the crucifix inscriptionINRI: “Iesus Nazarenus Rex Iudaeorum,” or “Jesus of Nazareth, King of the Jews.”)

A lot of what you're saying is hearsay and misinterpretation. Mainly as it was Paul and not Jesus who founded Christianity. Jesus was an obscure and little known prophet in his time. Paul made him folklore 50 years after.

You sure don't know your bible, then call me confused. Christianity by definition is based on the person and teachings of Jesus of Nazareth. And when it comes to authenticity, how can you not name Jesus. Without Jesus and His early teachings, Paul would have no message to spread.
Paul is viewed as the great interpreter of Jesus’ mission, arguably one of the most important and influential figures in our history, delivering that mission in a way no one had before. Not only did Paul testify of Jesus as his wonderful Savior, he loved Jesus so much, he died for his faith in God.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
JonathanSJ · 36-40, M
@jshm2 Probably she knows better than you.

 
Post Comment