I think that the average Atheist is a more moral person than the average Christian.
The Atheist is generally concerned with the well-being of other people as a broad basis for moral decisions.
Christians while also generally concerned with that seem to make an exception where they reckon it is in opposition to what god wants.
They also consider absolutely any atrocity to be an act of good if it is perpetrated by their god.
So who is the more moral person: The one who condemns slavery, rape and genocide under all circumstances or the one who excuses it depending on the perpetrator?
Christians while also generally concerned with that seem to make an exception where they reckon it is in opposition to what god wants.
They also consider absolutely any atrocity to be an act of good if it is perpetrated by their god.
So who is the more moral person: The one who condemns slavery, rape and genocide under all circumstances or the one who excuses it depending on the perpetrator?
