Exciting
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

The English King James Bible printed 1611 is perfect, no errors down to the very numbers, another proof Deut. 16:11.

This video recently proves it.

https://youtu.be/yS78mFJcvhQ?si=yH7ro6NguJTzrdXO
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Diotrephes · 70-79, M
The probability of you getting a real 1611 KJV is about zero. They are extremely rare. And the 1611 KJV was based on the popular Geneva Bible.
LordShadowfire · 100+, M
@Diotrephes With the exception that King James III had his translators intentionally mistranslate the word pedophile as homosexual, and the word poisoner as witch.
Diotrephes · 70-79, M
@LordShadowfire How do you know that to be true?
LordShadowfire · 100+, M
@Diotrephes Well, here's an article I just found, but it's not the one I originally read.

https://www.haaretz.com/archaeology/2017-08-17/ty-article/thou-shalt-not-suffer-a-witch-to-live-a-murderous-mistranslation/0000017f-e2c8-d804-ad7f-f3fa49340000
Diotrephes · 70-79, M
@LordShadowfire This is Exodus 22:18 in all of the English versions. They use different verbiage but the idea is the same =
https://www.biblegateway.com/verse/en/Exodus%2022:18
LordShadowfire · 100+, M
@Diotrephes All of those English versions owe their existence to the old King James version. Before that one, there were no English Bibles.
Diotrephes · 70-79, M
@LordShadowfire [quote]All of those English versions owe their existence to the old King James version. Before that one, there were no English Bibles.
[/quote]
Sorry to inform you but you are 100% wrong.

Read this site =
[b][i][c=BF0000]English Bible History[/c][/i][/b]
"Protestants today are largely unaware of their own history, and unaware of the Geneva Bible (which is textually 95% the same as the King James Version, but 50 years older than the King James Version, and not influenced by the Roman Catholic Rheims New Testament that the King James translators admittedly took into consideration). Nevertheless, the King James Bible turned out to be an excellent and accurate translation, and it became the most printed book in the history of the world, and the only book with one billion copies in print. In fact, for over 250 years…until the appearance of the English Revised Version of 1881-1885…the King James Version reigned without much of a rival. One little-known fact, is that for the past 250 years, all “King James Version” Bibles published anywhere by any publisher are actually Blaney’s 1769 Revised Oxford Edition of the 1611 King James Bible. The original “1611” preface is almost always deceivingly included by modern Bible publishing companies, and no mention of the fact that it is really the 1769 version is to be found, because that might hurt sales among those imagining that they are reading the original 1611 version.

The only way to obtain a true, unaltered, 1611 version is to either purchase an original pre-1769 printing of the King James Bible, or a less costly facsimile reproduction of the original 1611 King James Bible. A first edition facsimile reproduction of Blaney’s 1769 Revised Oxford Edition of the 1611 King James Bible is also available, which exemplifies the 20,000 spelling and punctuation changes and over 400 wording changes made to the original 1611 to 1768 King James Bible, when compared to King James Bibles published between 1769 and today."
https://greatsite.com/english-bible-history/

The KJV you read is actually a derivative of the 1769 KJV, which was later revised in the 1880s to delete the Apocrypha. So, the KJV that you have today is a revision of a revision of a revision.
LordShadowfire · 100+, M
@Diotrephes So what year did the Geneva Bible come out? What year was it first published? You don't mention that in your summary. You say it's 50 years older. 50 years older than which? The original 1611? The 1768? The 1880s?
Diotrephes · 70-79, M
@LordShadowfire If you noticed, I gave you the link to the article so that you could read it for yourself and maybe gain some insight on the subject. That way you can always refer to it at your convenience when you have questions.

A condensed answer to your question is that the Geneva Bible was written in 1560.

"The New Testament was completed in 1557, and the complete Bible was first published in 1560. It became known as the Geneva Bible. Due to a passage in Genesis describing the clothing that God fashioned for Adam and Eve upon expulsion from the Garden of Eden as “Breeches” (an antiquated form of “Britches”), some people referred to the Geneva Bible as the Breeches Bible.

The Geneva Bible was the first Bible to add numbered verses to the chapters, so that referencing specific passages would be easier. Every chapter was also accompanied by extensive marginal notes and references so thorough and complete that the Geneva Bible is also considered the first English “Study Bible”. William Shakespeare quotes hundreds of times in his plays from the Geneva translation of the Bible.

The Geneva Bible became the Bible of choice for over 100 years of English speaking Christians. [b][i][c=BF0000]Between 1560 and 1644 at least 144 editions of this Bible were published. Examination of the 1611 King James Bible shows clearly that its translators were influenced much more by the Geneva Bible, than by any other source.[/c][/i][/b] The Geneva Bible itself retains over 90% of William Tyndale’s original English translation. The Geneva in fact, remained more popular than the King James Version until decades after its original release in 1611! The Geneva holds the honor of being the first Bible taken to America, and the Bible of the Puritans and Pilgrims. It is truly the “Bible of the Protestant Reformation.” Strangely, the famous Geneva Bible has been out-of-print since 1644, so the only way to obtain one is to either purchase an original printing of the Geneva Bible, or a less costly facsimile reproduction of the original 1560 Geneva Bible.

With the end of Queen Mary’s bloody reign, the reformers could safely return to England. The Anglican Church, now under Queen Elizabeth I, reluctantly tolerated the printing and distribution of Geneva version Bibles in England."
https://greatsite.com/english-bible-history/

[b][i][c=BF0000]Geneva Bible[/c][/i][/b]
"The Geneva Bible is one of the most historically significant translations of the Bible into English, preceding the King James Version by 51 years.[1] It was the primary Bible of 16th century English Protestantism and was used by William Shakespeare,[2] Oliver Cromwell, John Knox, John Donne and others. It was one of the Bibles taken to America on the Mayflower (Pilgrim Hall Museum has collected several Bibles of Mayflower passengers). The Geneva Bible was used by many English Dissenters, and it was still respected by Oliver Cromwell's soldiers at the time of the English Civil War, in the booklet The Souldiers Pocket Bible.[3]

This version of the Bible is significant because, for the first time, a mechanically printed, mass-produced Bible was made available directly to the general public which came with a variety of scriptural study guides and aids (collectively called an apparatus), which included verse citations that allow the reader to cross-reference one verse with numerous relevant verses in the rest of the Bible, introductions to each book of the Bible that acted to summarize all of the material that each book would cover, maps, tables, woodcut illustrations and indices.

Because the language of the Geneva Bible was more forceful and vigorous, most readers strongly preferred this version to the Great Bible. In the words of Cleland Boyd McAfee, "it drove the Great Bible off the field by sheer power of excellence".[4]"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geneva_Bible#Modern_spelling_version_of_the_1599_Geneva_Bible
LordShadowfire · 100+, M
@Diotrephes [quote]If you noticed, I gave you the link to the article so that you could read it for yourself and maybe gain some insight on the subject. That way you can always refer to it at your convenience when you have questions.[/quote]
I noticed, after I posted that question. Just didn't feel like deleting it. Been dealing with some bullshit all day.