Hi everyone, please just reply to this post and concentrate on the question: "whether there has always been some being, instead of no being."
Just answer yes or no, and explain.
If you prefer to evade answering then I will just let you talk but I can't connect with you at all, so what is the purpose of your activity here in my thread?
= = === == = = = = = = = = = = = = =
yrger · 80-89, M
Hi everyone, let us all reply to this post from me, because how you reply will indicate whether you should continue here, or not.
You see if there has not been aways some being at all existing, way way back even before time and space in the material or physical universe appeared, then we don't exist today.
Unless you posit that some being can just spring forth from no being at all, which is a most absurd idea.
So, everyone please answer this issue, otherwise you are irrelevant in this thread.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
yrger · 80-89, M
Hi everyone, please react to my repeated post below.
yrger · 80-89, M
Hi everyone, what do you say about my post reproduced again below:
yrger · 80-89, M
Hi everyone, let us talk about whether there has always been some being, instead of no being.
From my part, if there has never been some being, how come we are now existing, unless you posit the absurd idea that from no being some being will come forth?
