Positive
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Creation versus Evolution. Why evolution is not sufficient to prove Bible wrong?

Bible is the holy book of Christians. It is nothing but the word of God.
Christianity should be considered for its historical viability.

We, Christians believe that God created the earth and the universe. Estimated age of earth is ~6000 years old. Some may argue that earth is billions of years old. We can term as old earth theory. But it is illogical to conclude something or question Bible without asking sufficient questions. Often people get carried away by some evidence and come to a conclusion. Evidence should be complemented by logical reasoning.

Everyone agree that Adam and Eve were the first humans created by God. When both Adam and Eve were created did they appear one day old. No. They were created as adults. Conclusions without logical reasoning and asking every possible questions are not sufficient to prove Bible wrong. Remember Bible is nothing but the word of God. Human ideas are also evolving and our science and research is improving day by day. It may not be perfect today but it may be more perfect tomorrow. Improvement is an ongoing process and perfection is never attained. Only God is perfect. Everything else is in transition. We need to ask do cosmology, geology and other sciences have evolved enough to prove Bible wrong? My belief in Jesus, our only savior helps me confidently say that Bible can never be wrong. It may be difficult for many to understand, but belief in God empowers logical reasoning.

About evolutions, can it prove Bible wrong? No. True that living beings may adapt to the environment. Let us agree that adaptations are genetically heritable and it is heritable across different environments. This is just an accumulation of data. That addresses What part of the phenomenon. But logical reasoning enables us to think about how and why ?
Why does genes behave in a particular way way ? Why does it adapt? Was it designed that way ? This is where creation/creator comes into picture. Without asking sufficient questions evolution or transitional forms is an incomplete understanding. Evolution by itself may not stand out, it may need a force to drive it.

The entire life on earth is driven by one force and I need not repeat it!
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Here's a thought. If man came from apes, why can't apes talk like people, by now? 😂😂😂 How is it humans were smart enough to learn and know how to talk but not apes or chimpanzees? 😂
redredred · M
@LadyGrace It has to do with the vocal structures in the throat. And, to put the lie to your question, Koko the gorilla did learn to talk using ASL and taught her offspring as well.
@redredred Some dogs can say "I love you", too. My cat used to say "mama" just as clear as could be and shocked us all one day, so you prove nothing. Koko was TAUGHT. He's an intelligent animal, but God made humans to be above the animal kingdom. Only difference is, you don't believe. And right back at ya...."All of your superstitious nonsense doesn’t change that one bit."
redredred · M
@LadyGrace Prove your god exists. I can prove humans and chimps have a common ancestor.
@redredred Proof of your chimp theory in your opinion, but not in science.
As far as proof of God, it is clear, after reading your answers for the last two years, that you're not seeking proof. Only to argue. You don't need proof. You need faith.
redredred · M
@LadyGrace Modern genetic science proves the common ancestry for both humans and chimps. It’s not a matter of opinion and the proof is certainly stronger than any proof you have for your silly invisible sky friend
SW-User
@LadyGrace Very logical argument
Here's a thought. If man came from apes, why can't apes talk like people, by now?
👌