Positive
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Creation versus Evolution. Why evolution is not sufficient to prove Bible wrong?

Bible is the holy book of Christians. It is nothing but the word of God.
Christianity should be considered for its historical viability.

We, Christians believe that God created the earth and the universe. Estimated age of earth is ~6000 years old. Some may argue that earth is billions of years old. We can term as old earth theory. But it is illogical to conclude something or question Bible without asking sufficient questions. Often people get carried away by some evidence and come to a conclusion. Evidence should be complemented by logical reasoning.

Everyone agree that Adam and Eve were the first humans created by God. When both Adam and Eve were created did they appear one day old. No. They were created as adults. Conclusions without logical reasoning and asking every possible questions are not sufficient to prove Bible wrong. Remember Bible is nothing but the word of God. Human ideas are also evolving and our science and research is improving day by day. It may not be perfect today but it may be more perfect tomorrow. Improvement is an ongoing process and perfection is never attained. Only God is perfect. Everything else is in transition. We need to ask do cosmology, geology and other sciences have evolved enough to prove Bible wrong? My belief in Jesus, our only savior helps me confidently say that Bible can never be wrong. It may be difficult for many to understand, but belief in God empowers logical reasoning.

About evolutions, can it prove Bible wrong? No. True that living beings may adapt to the environment. Let us agree that adaptations are genetically heritable and it is heritable across different environments. This is just an accumulation of data. That addresses What part of the phenomenon. But logical reasoning enables us to think about how and why ?
Why does genes behave in a particular way way ? Why does it adapt? Was it designed that way ? This is where creation/creator comes into picture. Without asking sufficient questions evolution or transitional forms is an incomplete understanding. Evolution by itself may not stand out, it may need a force to drive it.

The entire life on earth is driven by one force and I need not repeat it!
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
I think we can resolve the "humans coming from chimpanzees" right now. God created man, in His image. Not from animals. God created people to reflect His image, to rule over creation, and to reproduce godly offspring. But man messed that up when he chose to sin.
redredred · M
@LadyGrace Humans are taxonomically classified as great apes. Humans and chimps have a demonstrated common ancestor and are more closely related than chimps and gorillas.

All of your superstitious nonsense doesn’t change that one bit.
@redredred
Humans are taxonomically classified as great apes. Humans and chimps have a demonstrated common ancestor and are more closely related than chimps and gorillas. All of your superstitious nonsense doesn’t change that one bit.

That still doesn't explain why what I wrote is wrong.
redredred · M
@LadyGrace Because it’s clearly proven genetically that humans and chimps have a common ancestor species. You don’t have any similar proof of your mythical god story.
@redredred Oh, but I do. You're just one not to accept it.
redredred · M
@LadyGrace let’s see it, verifiable, objective actual proof at least as good as required by traffic court.

Don’t give me any of your silly delusional feelings or some claptrap quote from your inane book. Actual, objective, verifiable proof
SW-User
@LadyGrace Thank you for mentioning very precisely.
@redredred I strongly agree with @LadyGrace. According to you man was evolved from chimps.
We cant blame you as your understanding is influenced by the biased perspectives. Before going into the objective proof that God created man in his image you need to understand the deeper meaning of sin. Please read carefully what @LadyGrace has pointed out ,
But man messed that up when he chose to sin.
.
If as you say man really evolved from chimpanzees, then could you let us know approximately when did this transition happened ? Let us assume that it should be more than 6000 years. If I accept that, still I would be surprised why whole of chimpanzees have not yet transitioned to man. Why there are many animals still quadrupeds? Taking the garden of Eden for example, Garden looks good when there are variety of flowers. However if most of the flowers transition into a unique variety Garden wont be as beautiful. So with all the logical assumptions God creating man in His image sounds the most reasonable.
@SW-User Brilliant!! So true. ❤️🙏