Positive
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Creation versus Evolution. Why evolution is not sufficient to prove Bible wrong?

Bible is the holy book of Christians. It is nothing but the word of God.
Christianity should be considered for its historical viability.

We, Christians believe that God created the earth and the universe. Estimated age of earth is ~6000 years old. Some may argue that earth is billions of years old. We can term as old earth theory. But it is illogical to conclude something or question Bible without asking sufficient questions. Often people get carried away by some evidence and come to a conclusion. Evidence should be complemented by logical reasoning.

Everyone agree that Adam and Eve were the first humans created by God. When both Adam and Eve were created did they appear one day old. No. They were created as adults. Conclusions without logical reasoning and asking every possible questions are not sufficient to prove Bible wrong. Remember Bible is nothing but the word of God. Human ideas are also evolving and our science and research is improving day by day. It may not be perfect today but it may be more perfect tomorrow. Improvement is an ongoing process and perfection is never attained. Only God is perfect. Everything else is in transition. We need to ask do cosmology, geology and other sciences have evolved enough to prove Bible wrong? My belief in Jesus, our only savior helps me confidently say that Bible can never be wrong. It may be difficult for many to understand, but belief in God empowers logical reasoning.

About evolutions, can it prove Bible wrong? No. True that living beings may adapt to the environment. Let us agree that adaptations are genetically heritable and it is heritable across different environments. This is just an accumulation of data. That addresses What part of the phenomenon. But logical reasoning enables us to think about how and why ?
Why does genes behave in a particular way way ? Why does it adapt? Was it designed that way ? This is where creation/creator comes into picture. Without asking sufficient questions evolution or transitional forms is an incomplete understanding. Evolution by itself may not stand out, it may need a force to drive it.

The entire life on earth is driven by one force and I need not repeat it!
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
MaryJo1996 · 26-30, F
Evolution is more plausible than a fairy tale.

If you are to believe in God, then why not Cinderella? Snow White? Jack and the Beanstalk? Goldilocks? Etc. There all just stories, like the silliness about "God".
SW-User
@MaryJo1996 Evolution is just a means and there has to be a driving force.
Cindrellas, Snow Whites...so on can never be that driving force!
MaryJo1996 · 26-30, F
@SW-User The big bang was the driving force.

Point about fairy tales is that they are made up, just like the stories about God.
SW-User
@MaryJo1996 Christian Scriptures are historically outstanding. The resurrection of Jesus Christ in particular has considerable justification through secular and religious scholarship alike.
MaryJo1996 · 26-30, F
@SW-User Yes, a man died then came back to life. 🤣🤣🤣🤣
Sharon · F
@SW-User
The resurrection of Jesus Christ in particular has considerable justification through secular and religious scholarship alike.
The is considerable doubt as to whether biblical figure called Jesus ever existed. Odin was sacrificed on the Yggdrasil tree where his body hung for nine days and night before He was ressurected. The crucifixion story is remarkably similar - the bible even says "tree" rather than "cross" (Acts 10:39).
SW-User
@MaryJo1996 He is not a mere man. He is the son of God!
SW-User
@Sharon There may be speculations. But they are baseless!
Sharon · F
@SW-User That's what I said, there is no basis for believing the biblical Jesus even existed. As for being "the son of god", it would first be necessary to prove "god" existed. No one has managed to yet.
@MaryJo1996 blocked again ... for being another insulter from the UK
DocSavage · M
@SW-User
You are aware the the Egyptian god Horus also was resurrected after being nailed up. And much of Jesus’s history matches his. Only Horus predates Jesus.
It was a popular myth in the area at the time and the place.
Entwistle · 56-60, M
@DocSavage The virgin birth and the resurrection myths both predate Christianity.
DocSavage · M
@SW-User
No it isn’t. Roman historical records from the time don’t jive with the events in the bible.
Scripture has Jesus in different places at the same time. Scalars have checked it out, even if you haven’t. Is everyone else a liar ?
@MaryJo1996 Just in time for the Pantomime season....:)