I had a conversation with someone close to me about "separating art from the artist"…
He had an interesting perspective.
He was saying that even if he had been convinced that Michael Jackson was guilty of wrongdoing, enjoying his music after his death would not be the same as listening while he was still alive—none of the money spent now would be contributing to his personal comfort.
"So you don’t have to boycott Wagner, "he continued, "even though he was said to be a miserable human being. Nothing you spend to see or listen to his music performed is going into his pockets now."
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
@0uijaFinger Perhaps a little different to the Jackson analogy. Here the production of the piece of art may have depended upon objectionable behaviour in a way that Jackson's music did not obviously.