Fun
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Another myth bites the dust perhaps..

Oxford mathematician challenges long-standing claim about Parthenon optical corrections

In his paper, titled “The illusion of illusions: There are no optical corrections in the Parthenon,” Goriely traces the origins of the optical-correction explanation to the Roman architect and engineer Vitruvius, who wrote about Greek architecture centuries after the Parthenon was built. The explanation was subsequently repeated in architectural texts and became widely accepted.

Oh well, it was fun while it lasted...
Top | New | Old
MoveAlong · 70-79, M
AI just confirmed to me that the story about illusions being built into the Parthenon is a myth.

So the OP is correct.
Convivial · 26-30, F
@MoveAlong there you go, it must be true then😛
For a very interesting read, here is the link to the Vitruvius Wiki page:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vitruvius
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
Convivial · 26-30, F
@jshm2 questioning is I think always a good thing... We just have to be careful in separating the bathwater from the baby...

 
Post Comment