Sorry but a whale having or not having a boner

Is not an indication of there not being a supreme being and creator. How do you logically explain this irrational conclusion of “disproof”? As if

It’s neither here no there in regards to the proof or disproof of anything

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

Ferise1 · 46-50, M

It’s not a Boner😂 it’s proof they once had legs

YoMomma ·

@Ferise1 thats an assumption not proof of anything

Ferise1 · 46-50, M

@YoMomma
The evolution of whales
Proof that whales once had legs comes from extensive fossil evidence, showing gradual transitions from four-legged land mammals (like Pakicetus) to semi-aquatic forms (Ambulocetus) with powerful tails and hind limbs, to fully aquatic whales with tiny, vestigial leg bones still embedded within their bodies, showcasing evolution's path from land to sea.

YoMomma ·

@Ferise1 evolution is a fictional myth fyi there is no factual record of it anywhere just a bunch of bs theories they keep publishing in print and films as if it were facts when it’s not. It’s packs of lies fyi

Ferise1 · 46-50, M

@YoMomma wow