Sorry but a whale having or not having a boner

Is not an indication of there not being a supreme being and creator. How do you logically explain this irrational conclusion of “disproof”? As if

It’s neither here no there in regards to the proof or disproof of anything

Top | New | Old

ostfuidctyvm

There is no conclusive proof for or against the existence of a creator. The smartest brains acknowledge this. There is evidence to suggest, but no evidence to confirm. It's a question that we can debate but cannot answer. So it comes down to what you believe.

I believe that I am the god of SW though 👏

YoMomma ·

@ostfuidctyvm it’s a matter of opinion what is or isn't proof apparently 😅

StygianKohlrabi · 46-50, M

I'm not following. What does whale pr0n have to do with it?

YoMomma ·

@StygianKohlrabi nothing.. that’s my point 😅

Ambroseguy80 · 56-60, M

I guess that would explain how they became sperm whales. 🐳 🤭

Ferise1 · 46-50, M

It’s not a Boner😂 it’s proof they once had legs

View 1 more replies »

Ferise1 · 46-50, M

@YoMomma
The evolution of whales
Proof that whales once had legs comes from extensive fossil evidence, showing gradual transitions from four-legged land mammals (like Pakicetus) to semi-aquatic forms (Ambulocetus) with powerful tails and hind limbs, to fully aquatic whales with tiny, vestigial leg bones still embedded within their bodies, showcasing evolution's path from land to sea.

YoMomma ·

@Ferise1 evolution is a fictional myth fyi there is no factual record of it anywhere just a bunch of bs theories they keep publishing in print and films as if it were facts when it’s not. It’s packs of lies fyi

Ferise1 · 46-50, M

@YoMomma wow

Add a comment...