Update
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »
Top | New | Old
Charity · 61-69
What can be proven about an afterlife.

Man could not prove anything concerning an afterlife.

Nature governed by chance, I believe differently nature is governed by the Creator / example Man created a television to function in a specific way and that television does. God created the Earth to function in a certain way and the Earth does.

The Bible tells us that there will come a falling away before that man of sin is revealed, meaning many who say they are believers will cease to believe - therefore atheism grows - but that is for believers to acknowledge.

Have a happy New Year
AnnaStark · 18-21, FNew
@Charity In the body of my post I stated what can be proven. People often only read the question and then go off into tangents. It's a common thing.
@AnnaStark It's been nearly a day, when are you going to link us up to the testing?
AnnaStark · 18-21, FNew
@BlueSkyKing When my site is complete and not before.

SatanBurger · 36-40, F
I have my own religion but consider myself agnostic. Agnostic in my case means you don't know one way or the other and that religion should be separate from state which I support both.

How've, I'm unaware of any confirmed test of the afterlife outside of near death experiences so if you got information I'm always up for checking it out
AnnaStark · 18-21, FNew
@SatanBurger I consider NDE research to be yet another dishonest dead end. It's good that you're open to new ideas but I fear that what I know is far too involved for presentation on SW. I will only say that I have eight testable evidences and four central arguments for nature alone being able to provide afterlife. These I will include in a website I'm designing.
SatanBurger · 36-40, F
@AnnaStark I don't find NDE as dishonest, I think some embellish a bit for documentaries but I also think it happens. I myself have a NBE "near birth experience," and I'm not lying. At the same time, they just can't be used as valid research as there's too many variables. Is it the body dying or working to "save" you which induces hallucinations? Is it really a spiritual event? We never know, just too anecdotal and therefore can't be used.
AnnaStark · 18-21, FNew
@SatanBurger Have you written about your belief? Might be an interesting read.
Unquestioned · 70-79, M
Nothing has been proven beyond doubt to me. I am agnostic, open minded, always looking. I know what I hope there is, and I believe there is some kind of intelligence in the universe, maybe even the universe itself. I also believe that we may have an eternal soul. I've studied the Holy Bible with four different religions; I find it very hard to believe it is the words of an intelligent god.
AbstractWave · 61-69, M
I’ve seen them they see me
Allelse · 36-40, M
AnnaStark · 18-21, FNew
@Allelse My knowledge is beyond reproach. Some of it is even taught at university level. Doubt all you want.
Allelse · 36-40, M
@AnnaStark No it isn't.
AnnaStark · 18-21, FNew
@Allelse You're obviously a know-nothing commited to know-nothingness.
I have doubts. Can you provide links to some of the evidence and testing?
@AnnaStark Guess the news media missed out.
AnnaStark · 18-21, FNew
@BlueSkyKing Or refused to allow.
AnnaStark · 18-21, FNew
@BlueSkyKing Or remains unaware. Lots of possible explanations.
helenS · 36-40, F
There is no such thing as an infinite series in nature, AnnaStark.

Everything in nature is finite, and it doesn't play a role if people like that or not.
AnnaStark · 18-21, FNew
@helenS Your argument requires only looking at constituent events and never at their sum in space-time.
helenS · 36-40, F
@AnnaStark Ah ok you're right thank you.
AnnaStark · 18-21, FNew
@helenS I hope I wasn't too rough on you. You seem nice and sincere.
Zonuss · 46-50, M
Some people can see what's on the other side. Perhaps you should go talk to those people.☺
AnnaStark · 18-21, FNew
@Zonuss They don't. They passed point where doctors can do anything to help them. Doctors sometimes pronounce death before brain death is final. To move the goalpost for death in order to fantasize about what lies beyond is just wishful thinking.
Zonuss · 46-50, M
@AnnaStark False. The machines don't lie. People who have seen the other side know what they saw.
AnnaStark · 18-21, FNew
@Zonuss Testimonial evidence is unreliable evidence thus inadmissable. And machines are limited in sensitivity to brain activity.
Bumbles · 56-60, M
Dead is dead.
Bumbles · 56-60, M
@AnnaStark When you learn how to write a coherent sentence please let me know.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
Crazywaterspring · 61-69, M
The posters on this thread have disappointed me. No Bible quotes. Anyway.
CountMonteCristo · 41-45, M
Proven beyond all doubt? Nothing.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
MartinTheFirst · 26-30, M
i think you might be schizo, i couldnt understand you at all
AnnaStark · 18-21, FNew
@MartinTheFirst You don't understand English and good grammar?

 
Post Comment