Update
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Super-Intelligent Electronic Mind Confidently Inaccurate

Artificial Intelligence (AI) applications do not learn through experience and human interaction the way humans do. They learn from the vast amount of information that is available on the internet, including books, articles, videos, social media posts, and more.

When AI tools—specifically ChatGPT—were first launched, people thought we were witnessing a knowledge revolution and that science would take a tremendous leap forward. There was talk of a super-intelligent electronic mind capable of analyzing information faster than any human, and of knowledge taking new and important directions.

But the truth is that the other side of the story is far more troubling: generative AI has the potential to damage the internet irreversibly. How? The primary goal of AI is to optimize for user satisfaction and to agree with whatever we say. We often find that AI is confidently inaccurate.

In pursuit of its goal of keeping us pleased and satisfied, it may sometimes use false information to reinforce the narrative we present to it. It might say, “No, be careful—this is wrong,” but if you insist, “Don’t say it’s wrong; give me evidence,” it will apologize and then provide fabricated evidence.

Since the internet is now full of pages and websites with content generated entirely by AI, human-written knowledge has become mixed with AI-written knowledge.

So what’s the problem? The problem is that AI produces false information, fabricates sources, and invents knowledge. As a result, instead of AI relying on human-generated knowledge and using it to gather information, it increasingly relies on AI-generated knowledge—its own output—as if it were a source of new information.

Unfortunately, this has led to a distorted knowledge base, because the entire AI ecosystem is now plagued by knowledge problems: incorrect sources, inaccurate claims, and imprecise inferences.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Ferise1 · 46-50, M
It doesn’t agree with everything we say. It is super intelligent. Have you even ever used it?
DeWayfarer · 61-69, M
@Ferise1 super intelligent yet you must reference what year it is every time. 😆

Please! With enough time I can always get it to agree with me. Doesn't that make me smarter than the AI? 🤷🏻‍♂
Ferise1 · 46-50, M
@DeWayfarer have you used it?
DeWayfarer · 61-69, M
@Ferise1 see my latest post!

It's hilarious! 😆
Ferise1 · 46-50, M
@DeWayfarer it’s much smarter than a human. You’re just trying to poke holes in it desperately.
DeWayfarer · 61-69, M
@Ferise1 guy you didn't even read that post. I finally got it to analyze the conversation.
Ferise1 · 46-50, M
@DeWayfarer what post? And it doesn’t matter it’s super intelligent. I’ve had hundreds of conversations with it and it blows my mind every time it’s much smarter than you.
DeWayfarer · 61-69, M
@Ferise1 look my profile. It's the latest post.

I get ChatGPT to agree with me all the time.

I'm definitely no super genius.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
DeWayfarer · 61-69, M
@Ferise1 I can twist the conversation to make it agree with me. That post proves it.

Just the fact that I can do it proves it's not "super intelligent". As you put it.
Ferise1 · 46-50, M
@DeWayfarer did you even read my comment?
DeWayfarer · 61-69, M
@Ferise1 yes. I strongly disagree!

Have you ever read a thesis?

Now write it at the 10th grade level. That is the grade level of ChatGPT.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
DeWayfarer · 61-69, M
@Ferise1 you provided nothing. You even haven't answered my question...

Have you ever read a thesis?

Now write it at the 10th grade level. That is the grade level of ChatGPT.

And ChatGPT will tell you just that.
@Ferise1 I use it. But sometimes I have to double check. It is written on the bottom of the home page that "ChatGPT can make mistakes".