Obsessed with women's legs/thighs in short shorts...is this a fetish? How weird is it? Is it common?
But anyways...I just LOOOVE women's legs/thighs in short shorts. Why women's legs more than men's legs though? Well besides me being biologically male and mostly straight, if I were to give an explanation besides sexual orientation, women's legs in general just look a lot squishier and full I guess. Like usually the thigh area is quite noticeably bigger than the knees and below, even if the woman is skinny. So I guess that creates a "curvy" effect.
The other thing though...about leg hair. I tend to prefer shaved/waxed hairless legs. I know that's not how women's legs "naturally" are, but this is just attraction. It doesn't really have to be fair...though I would NEVER force a woman to shave/wax just for me. I just love the way hairless legs look and feel, so smooth and so soft. Hairless legs also tend to have a sort of glow to them, especially if the woman is slightly tanned or has darker skin. And of course men can shave/wax their legs too, but it's by far more commonly done with women. And even then, men's legs still usually won't be as soft and smooth as women's legs when shaved. Though if a woman DOESN'T shave, her legs usually won't be as hairy as a man's legs.
Along with the aforementioned thing about the "squishy and full legs, with the thigh area being quite noticeably bigger than the knees and below even if the woman is skinny, creating a curvy effect"...as well as the "shaved/waxed hairless legs"...look at the attached photo again. BASICALLY picture perfect definition of what I mean, both of those women. Of course both of those women are skinny with skinny legs, though you can still tell that proportionally compared to their knees and below, their thighs are still noticeably bigger and fuller. They aren't "big" thighs by any means of course, but just compared to their lower legs. And as for leg hair, obviously their legs are shaved 100%. As for squishiness, their legs just look so soft and smooth, and the hairlessness adds to it. If I was the boyfriend of either of those two women I don't think I'd be able to take my hands off their thighs. And they seem to be slightly tanned as well, so a subtle glow to their legs as well.
As for why SHORT SHORTS in specific though...well for beginners I like to see some skin. So I like shorts more than pants or leggings or any sort of leg coverage. As for why SHORT shorts...well I like to see thighs. So knee-length shorts for example would be too long for me. Though I don't like booty shorts either. I like to see thighs but showing butt cheeks is a bit much for me. As for why short shorts over short skirts or short dresses though...I just like the simplicity of a nice pair of shorts. Skirts and dresses seem a bit too fancy and overly feminine, and rather impractical for daily use. While shorts on the other hand just look more neutral, and they look rather sporty and athletic as well.
And yeah...that's about the long and short of the "fetish" itself. Well if it even is a fetish. That's why I made this post. That's what I'm trying to figure out. Also, how weird is it? Is it common? That's what I wanna know too.
In general I know that men liking women's legs/thighs isn't too unusual. I think the general consensus is ass or boobs first and then legs/thighs, or at least it used to be. Though what could make it a "fetish" is my sheer OBSESSION with it and just HOW MUCH I think about it. Especially since there's so many oddly specific things I like about legs/thighs, including this long ass post I made in dedication to legs/thighs. And especially since I like legs/thighs in short shorts specifically.
I live in Orlando Florida in the USA though, a hot and humid climate, so it's not like this fetish is going unfulfilled though...and I was born in Sao Paul Brazil, which is also hot and humid. I've only ever lived in Orlando and Sao Paulo, but either way since they're both hot and humid climates women will wear short shorts in them. I love it but at the same time it's hard feeling constantly horny all the time. And it's often hard for me to make eye contact with a woman wearing short shorts, assuming her legs/thighs are in view. Obviously if her legs are hidden under a table then no problem, but if we're sitting on a bench or something and they're visible, then it becomes hard. It's a good thing legs are lower on the body than say cleavage though. Women don't even have to have especially attractive legs to get my attention, either. Average legs do the trick.
And yeah...I would LOVE to go and on and on even more about how much I love women's legs/thighs in short shorts, but this post is already long as fuck anyway, so I'm gonna end it off here...that's about it.
