This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
thrash · 31-35, M
we could be good friends but not best friends... atheism is pretty hubristic ....and thats comng from the emperor of the galaxy (my gender)
thrash · 31-35, M
@newjaninev2 https://similarworlds.com/science/5238677-it-is-a-fact-that-science-is-not-fit-to-be-an-absolute
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@thrash that's a post about something you call 'scientism'.
I asked why you feel it's hubristic to have no gods
I asked why you feel it's hubristic to have no gods
thrash · 31-35, M
@newjaninev2 connect the dots, grandma
most atheists dispute existence of the supernatural based on physcalist/scientism-esque views -- which is understandable but hubristic: who are you to think that you were born with the biological capability necessary to behold reality in its entirety? to be (capable of being) the ultimate authority on reality? pure hubris.
most atheists dispute existence of the supernatural based on physcalist/scientism-esque views -- which is understandable but hubristic: who are you to think that you were born with the biological capability necessary to behold reality in its entirety? to be (capable of being) the ultimate authority on reality? pure hubris.
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@thrash 1. there's no proof that gods exist
2. there's no proof that gods don't exist
3. there's no compelling necessity to postulate the existence of gods, and the postulation explains nothing... it merely tries to explain everything away.
4. therefore, I have no gods.
Please identify the hubris
2. there's no proof that gods don't exist
3. there's no compelling necessity to postulate the existence of gods, and the postulation explains nothing... it merely tries to explain everything away.
4. therefore, I have no gods.
Please identify the hubris