Hi Doc, you are again running away to your septic tank, I am talking about my God, not magic. Are you perhaps a robot but not programmed to know the context of the dialog?
The robot must be programmed by its master to know the concept of my God, namely: "God is the permanent or eternal self-existent creator and operator of everything that is not God Himself."
This robot must have been programmed wrongly by its master, who dwells in a septic tank, to distort my concept of God.
In sum, hi Doc, you never ever show God cannot exist - except your silly ridiculous distorted concept of God.
Conclusion: You are only attacking a strawman, that is what all atheists essentially are doing, attacking strawmen.
I theist Yrger suggest to you atheist Doc, that you attack my concept of God by insisting that God is not needed because: the universe exists permanently and eternally.
yrger · 80-89, M
From Yrger to Doc
Hi Doc, you are again running away from my challenge to you for us talking on the difference between fact and truth. Shame on you, go hide in your septic tank.
Hi Doc, and you are woefully mistaken about there is a difference between permanent and eternal (there is no difference), as in my definition of God:
God is the permanent or eternal self-existent creator and operator of everything that is not God Himself.
Now I propose that we talk about your best argument (if any) against God exists.
Do you accept my proposal?
Please don't go into incoherent vacuous verbosity, just say yes you accept or no you don't accept.
DocSavage · M
Ball is now in your court. I have answered your question. The proposal has been met. Your turn.
Give us your best argument for the existence of magic as relative to your god.
Spiritual entity, self existing, matter / energy conversion, knowledge, abilities all had to come from magical means . All of which would have to conform to a pre planned agenda in order to produce what we have now. Where did the magic come from ? Even god can’t do it by himself.
Do you accept the challenge, or will you wuss out ( again ) .
