This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
DocSavage · M
No, I’ve already heard your description of god. I’ve already pointed out numerous impractical flaws in it too. You claim to use reason and intelligence, but the god you believe in is neither reasonable nor intelligent.
But, like all theist, you ignore it. Your god is omnipotent, so you continue to assert whatever, no matter how nonsensical it is.
The fact that you claim god made a creation that is completely alien and opposite his own nature is a perfectly legitimate observation. You provided no answers. Each time you failed, you tossed in things like “love” and morality into the mix. Both of which would be meaningless to the entity you claim. The Devil, is in the details in this case. Too many questions pop up . And no matter how powerful your god is, you just can’t make it work. So there’s no point in debating further. You’ll just ignore the hard question with another straw man. Fallacies are all you got.
But, like all theist, you ignore it. Your god is omnipotent, so you continue to assert whatever, no matter how nonsensical it is.
The fact that you claim god made a creation that is completely alien and opposite his own nature is a perfectly legitimate observation. You provided no answers. Each time you failed, you tossed in things like “love” and morality into the mix. Both of which would be meaningless to the entity you claim. The Devil, is in the details in this case. Too many questions pop up . And no matter how powerful your god is, you just can’t make it work. So there’s no point in debating further. You’ll just ignore the hard question with another straw man. Fallacies are all you got.