How do atheists explain theists' adherence to God.

@DocSavage

Hi everyone, take notice that DocSavage is now into evasion, namely: not answering my request to him in concise words:

That has been always this evasive routine of DocSavage:
1. He says that our existence does not imply the existence of God.
2. So I ask him what does it imply, and to answer my request in concise words.
3. Now he has gone awol.


Paging DocSavage, please resume our dialogue:

You say our existence i.e. mankind does not imply the existence of God, and I tell you that I will shelf that negative statement of yours for the time being in regard to non-implication to God from our existence, but tell me what our existence implicate then? And tell me in concise words.









yrger · 80-89, M
@DocSavage

Hi DocSavage, you tell me, "The question of existence itself is self evident."

Thanks, so we are existing and everything that we talk about is existing in one way or another, no need to prove that nothing became something which is absolute absurdity.


Now, you continue with the categorical negative statement:
"Our existence doesn’t imply god’s."

I will put that negative statement from you on the shelf for the time being.


Please tell me what for you does our existence imply, and make it concise - please answer and abstain from bringing in a question to me, because then we would be going on and on and on and on with questions and more questions . . .







DocSavage · M
The question of existence itself is self evident. It’s the mechanism you’re arguing. Not the results.
Our existence doesn’t imply god’s.