This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
yrger · 80-89, M
@DocSavage
Hi DocSavage, you tell me, "The question of existence itself is self evident."
Thanks, so we are existing and everything that we talk about is existing in one way or another, no need to prove that nothing became something which is absolute absurdity.
Now, you continue with the categorical negative statement:
"Our existence doesn’t imply god’s."
I will put that negative statement from you on the shelf for the time being.
Please tell me what for you does our existence imply, and make it concise - please answer and abstain from bringing in a question to me, because then we would be going on and on and on and on with questions and more questions . . .
DocSavage · M
The question of existence itself is self evident. It’s the mechanism you’re arguing. Not the results.
Our existence doesn’t imply god’s.
Hi DocSavage, you tell me, "The question of existence itself is self evident."
Thanks, so we are existing and everything that we talk about is existing in one way or another, no need to prove that nothing became something which is absolute absurdity.
Now, you continue with the categorical negative statement:
"Our existence doesn’t imply god’s."
I will put that negative statement from you on the shelf for the time being.
Please tell me what for you does our existence imply, and make it concise - please answer and abstain from bringing in a question to me, because then we would be going on and on and on and on with questions and more questions . . .
DocSavage · M
The question of existence itself is self evident. It’s the mechanism you’re arguing. Not the results.
Our existence doesn’t imply god’s.