Rational intelligent thinking brings man to the God of nature.

There are three ways man comes to know God exists:
1. By reasoning
2. By reading the Bible (for Muslims, the Koran)
3. By meditation

I come to know God exists by num 1 i.e. reasoning, but it is the God of nature, that means that God created everything that man encounters in nature, and that by man's natural reason and intelligence.

What about you atheists? You should be able to come to the God of nature, because you have from nature the faculty of reason and of intelligence.

The explanation why you deny even the God of nature to exist, is because you are not natural but un-natural.

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

yrger · 80-89, M

@deadgerbil

Thanks for reading my posts, I am the Yrger the theist, and I authored the thread here, "Rational intelligent thinking brings man to the God of nature."

You are new here, welcome to my writings here in the current thread.

You ask:[quote]deadgerbil · 22-25, F
@yrger how is this comment any different than the one you posted a few minutes ago?

https://similarworlds.com/atheism/4595117-Rational-intelligent-thinking-brings-man-to-the-God-of?rid=55477364[/quote]

Are the two comments exactly the same?

That's what you noticed - good girl!

Perhaps you should have asked me instead, why I repeated the comment.

Anyway, read the comment again, and tell me whether you agree with me or not, [i]scil.[/i][quote]No, it's not begging the question, because I go outside concepts in my mind to seek evidence of the creator God in the concrete reality of our neighborhood.

And I have found evidence, namely: for example babies and roses in our everywhee neighborhood, babies and roses ultimately come from God, "The God (of nature) that is the permanent self-existent spirit creator and operator of man and the universe and everything transient in nature.[/quote]

[quote] yrger · 80-89, M
From Yrger the theist and author of the thread, "Rational intelligent thinking brings man to the God of nature."

Correction: the line below, "No, it's begging the question" should read: No, it's not begging the question."

Corrected version:
yrger · 80-89, M
@LeopoldBloom No, it's not begging the question, because I go outside concepts in my mind to seek evidence of the creator God in the concrete reality of our neighborhood.

And I have found evidence, namely: for example babies and roses in our everywhee neighborhood, babies and roses ultimately come from God, "The God (of nature) that is the permanent self-existent spirit creator and operator of man and the universe and everything transient in nature."

@DocSavage

@newjaninev2

@TheoreticSkeptic

@Emosaur

@LeopoldBloom

@HollyW

@TheoreticSkeptic

@Thodsis

@Mithraia[/quote]

@DocSavage

@newjaninev2

@BibleData

@Emosaur

@LeopoldBloom

@HollyW

@BibleData

@Thodsis

@SW-User

@deadgerbil

deadgerbil · 22-25

@yrger yeah I've been casually reading this post and this post represents a very strange way to communicate in general. You easily could've replied directly to my comment but for whatever reason you do it indirectly by adding a comment to the post itself instead of the comment thread and you've been doing this to consistently across the board. And nothing with you is ever succinct. It's repetitive and amounts to spam. Therefore I'm turning off notifications for this post. It's a bunch of nonsense.

yrger · 80-89, M

@deadgerbil

I prefer to not use the reply feature because it does not (I could be wrong though) directly reply to me, but it replies to others and others reply to others and on and on like an unwieldy column wide at the top and narrow at the bottom.