Hi Doc, you say, "I already presented my argument* on your last thread, you couldn’t refute it, so you ran away.
*Not definition
As you have already refuted my explanation, which refutation I could not have seen it because you are not a systematic expositor, that's why I could not have recognized it, please repeat it like in this way:
1.
2.
3.
Etc
==============
DocSavage · M
Okay, here is my definition of God:
"God is the permanent self-existent spirit creator and operator of man and the universe and everything transient."
All I want to tell them is that they must have the correct definition of God, otherwise they are denying the wrong god to not exist.
Best you get the definition of God from theists, theists are the authority of the definition of God Whom they know to exist.
Hi Doc, you don't know what is evidence, I challenge you to produce your definition of evidence, without going to dictionaries.
(Haha, and you are wasting my time, and I just love you because you are created by God as I am. )
Since you are incapable of giving straight answers to straight questions.
Here, is what you consider to be evidence of god presented earlier. As everyone can plainly see, you haven’t got a clue about what evidence is.
You asked for my definition of god, but you don’t want that. You want people here to use your definition of god, and then argue it
While you say it’s unfalsifiable, all with no evidence , of course.
Not gonna play your childish games chuckles. I already presented my definition on your last thread, you couldn’t refute it, so you ran away.
Every bit as probable and likely as yours. Without evidence against it.
But, you’re not going to admit it. So stop wasting time.
