Hi newjaninev2, please tell me where are what are the two members of my bifurcation fallacy, and why is it a fallacy.
Next, you are so concerned with technicality of using the reply feature, but the important thing is whether you are intelligent to get my ideas or not, and you obviously are only into technic but not 'realy-nic'.
Tell me, has there always been some being or there was never ever any being - if so, how come we are here today?
You see, there is the spirit that is God, he is not composed of parts, but the universe is composed of parts and bits and everything else that is composed of particles and particles and particles and particles, but particles do not create themselves and do not put themselves together, it is the spirit that is God, that is why ultimately it is God:
The permanent self-existent spirit creator and operator of man and the universe and everything transient.
===========
newjaninev2 · 51-55, F
@yrger
there has always been a being... The opposite is unthinkable, why? Because then we would not be here
In what way are those two assertions connected?
You’re making the bifurcation fallacy... there is only A and B
Butt that’s simply not so.
Have you really not learned to use the ‘reply’ button You expect people to listen to whatever you assert, yet you cannot master a simple ‘reply’ button? 😂
