Sad
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

It's kinda sad to see atheists become so religious with their views

Religious atheists may seem like an oxymoron, but in the sense of "religious" meaning zealously devoted to something, it's a valid term. Atheists who make atheism something they have to preach to people with the hopes of turning others to their beliefs, while also criticizing those who do follow religion for doing the same thing, they've become the very thing that they hate and are just too radical to realize it! That's what makes it so sad, they like to say they're so much more rational than religious fanatics, when they're just a different kind of fanatic who can't be reasoned with. I'm sure I'm gonna get a few of those types of atheists who aim to prove me wrong, only to end up proving my point, but whatever. This is just me thinking aloud.
YourMomsSecretCrush · M Best Comment
there are fanatical religious folk and fanatical non religious folk. ideas different but alot of the same methods.

JimboSaturn · 51-55, M
There shouldn't even be a word for not believing in God like there is no word for not believing in Santa Claus, it's just not believing in a supernatural creator.

I think you can be right though. Anyone who only makes posts about one thing like atheism, sounds like they are preaching.

I think this anti-atheist post and anti-religion posts have to stop.
I think it's okay to express or publish one's reasons for holding a specific belief or set of views and values. This allows others the opportunity to listen to, deeply understand and evaluate another's ideas. This is particularly useful if the listener is young, curious and seeking to know more about how the peoples of this world think.

What doesn't work is insisting on trying to persuade others that one's own view is the only correct view. Others have an equal right to their views even if we disagree.
Most people jack up and become defensive or angry if someone tries to talk them into something against their will.

Most atheists keep their views to themselves.

But it might be helpful try to understand why there is an increase in some atheists seeking to propagate their views.
We see the amount of harm that occurs under the banners of the major religions: the Inquisition, the Crusades, religious wars and jihads, the oppression of women, in some instances the justification of racism, the use of religion to gain power over land, wealth, resources, and other humans, institutionally condoned child abuse and rape, cruelty to animals and exploitation of the planet, and unavoidable hypocrisy on vast scales.

Of course, there is also good done in the name of religions: the Red Cross and Green Crescent; many charities run by religious groups, beautiful architecture, music, art and cultural artifacts, and the encouragement to lead an ethical and moral life. Some religious people do live profoundly good lives.
If most did, I might I have been persuaded to join one of their groups. But these few are the rare exceptions.
The basic fallibility of humans cannot be rescued by faith; hundreds of centuries of history have proven it. We need to try new ways of trying to build a better world.

For atheists, one of the most dangerous aspects of religion is its insistence on believing in a God whose existence cannot be proven with either fact or logic. Conversely it's easy to prove God doesn't exist with both logic and fact. Atheists believe that the tendencies of religion to convince people of that which is not real is dangerous for society as a whole; it inculcates gullibility and a willingness to not accept reality as it is, as the evidence shows.
We cannot address the problems or people's emotions, or social, economic or ecological issues unless we first understand what causes them and develop the means to educate people on how a why we need to live ethically, treating all other sentient life as equal in value to our own.
BlueVeins · 22-25
Eh, there are rational reasons to want less religion in the world, most of which ultimately boil down to non-empiricist ideology benefiting ideas and proposals which are disconnected from reality. I can't stomach debates on religion these days but I respect those who can.

And honestly, if you think there's any hypocrisy in wanting less religion while also championing an ideology, you've kinda missed the point.
sarabee1995 · 26-30, F
You're so right here Alex. I don't proselytize for my beliefs, but I also don't shy away from being honest if someone asks. I'm a person of faith. You know this.

And many of my friends are people of faith and many are atheist and agnostic, etc. But a small number of those atheist friends are just as annoying to me as those small number of religious friends who both seek to convince me that they are right and I am wrong and I need to begin believing as they do. 🙄
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
KiwiBird · 36-40, F
Everyones journey of Faith is different who are we to judge.

 
Post Comment