@
Diotrephes You can leave the mountains alone but do the tree thing today.
I don't know what you mean. Maybe you will explain further down in the post.
There is no mention of anyone ever doing those things. His apostles didn't do it. No pope or cardinal ha ever done it. The Apostles never did it. But you can be the first. Do it today. Prove you faith or else consider taking up a new hobby.
You use scripture, which is really cool and sort of out of place on these forums. They don't want to hear it, for the most part. They don't acknowledge it, they don't accept that it means anything so it's pointless to use in an argument here. I picked up on that right away. Cool that you do that anyway. Formerly Christian, if I may ask? You don't have to answer. I don't know you. Maybe you are a believer. You may have even told me already but my memory is all but useless these days.
Uh, you're talking about faith like it should be a magical sort of thing. It isn't what Jesus was talking about. I'll try to explain what I mean.
God is a spirit being. That just means he's not a physical being. It means we can't see him. Same with the spirit creatures. He can enable us with certain abilities through his holy spirit. Holy means sacred, belonging to, in this case, God. Through the holy spirit Michael, the first created spirit being, created all other things. Through the same force Some of the prophets of old, Jesus and his disciples healed people and performed remarkable things of this nature. It isn't a super power or magic. Think of it in practical terms. The apostle Paul mentioned these sorts of things as having taken place as they were needed, and that they would end with the disciples because they wouldn't any longer be necessary. They accomplished their purpose. The people that were healed would go on to die like everyone else, but it demonstrated the possibilities and it provided an indication to witnesses or who the aforementioned people were working for, so to speak.
So speaking in tongues, prophecy, healing etc. are no longer expected or needed.
When you read the Bible you have to take some things into account. Who is it talking to is very important. Just because Jesus told his disciples a thing doesn't mean he is telling us that thing. The same applied to them. Just because Jehovah told Adam, Moses, or anyone else something didn't mean it applied to them. For example, the law of Moses doesn't apply to Christians. It's just an example, as Jude said, for us to examine what went on in that specific time to those specific people.
Faith is what he is talking about there and you can put that in very practical terms that can and does apply to us. Not like we can wish a mountain away into the sea like silly magic, but we can literally move mountains with faith. Faith means absolute trust. The Latin word credit means belief, trust. Faith. Same thing.
If I have a mining operation I can use credit with banks who trust or believe that I can fulfill the obligation of an arrangement in which I pay back the loan with interest. With equipment I can literally move the mountain of earth. If faith and trust in money how much more so with faith in God?
An example: atheists often use iron chariots. God couldn't defend Israel against the iron chariots. Typical atheist 1/4 consideration. Jehovah told Israel that they had to have faith in him for him to defend them against their enemies. They didn't. So he didn't. In the case of the chariots they learned this the hard way, they changed and Jehovah did as he had promised.
Now, that pisses atheists off. I see militant atheist (very different than the majority of atheists) as being liked spoiled children pissing and moaning about things they are almost totally unaware of. They don't look for truth. They look for justification of their atheistic position.
God isn't some arrogant bearded magic sky king who is jealous and demanding obedience for no reason. He's jealous and demanding in a sense because it's best for us. So the faith he demanded of Israel had the purpose of instructing them in what capacity he could, for lack of a better term, serve them. To guide and protect them. Them having no faith in him prevented them from seeing the very important bigger picture. His purpose for mankind to live forever in peace on earth.
Their existence, the existence of their enemies, was temporal.
Ughh. Blah, blah, blah . . . I don't mean to preach. That's my understanding based upon years of study. We are having a discussion.
As far as the death and destruction part, read the book of Revelation. It's full of action.
Oh, yes! Believers and unbelievers alike often think of the "old testament" God as being totally different from the "new testament" God. Which is nonsense. They are the same, only the times are different. More destruction takes place in Revelation than the Hebrew scriptures. The term new and old testament is based upon a Latin mistranslation. The word translated into the Latin (Vulgate) testament is actually covenant. The Bible has a brief introduction followed by the first prophecy of the Messiah and the division of the people into those for Jehovah God (his seed) and those who are for Satan (his seed). (Genesis 3:15) The remainder of the Bible is about that.
How many zombies have you seen in your lifetime? Read what it says. If the dead do not rise, the Christ is nor risen. That means that it is normal for the dead to rise. Have you ever witnessed that? I haven't, except in religious zombie movies. You do know that zombie movies are religious movies and not horror movies don't you? They are preaching this biblical passage.
Whoa, whoa, whoa there now! Paul was talking about the resurrection hope. Some people circulating among the congregations were positing that there was going to be no resurrection. He was saying that if there was no resurrection there wouldn't have been any point in Jesus' own resurrection. That was the point. He demonstrated that resurrection was a real possibility, and that Jesus was the only one who had made that possible for everyone else.
The KJV and NKJV aren't really very good translations. https://biblehub.com/1_corinthians/15-15.htm
As a parenthetical aside, Hollyweird's take on Zombies isn't even in itself entirely accurate to say the least. A zombie is actually someone who, in primitive cultures, has been poisoned to appear dead. Their vital signs are almost undetectable. An enemy would poison someone and they would be pronounced dead, and sometimes they would revive and walk around again. The Bible doesn't make reference to zombies.