I Am An Atheist

Samael’s religion self-made, as written by thee:
Though, Samael was taking a college course, “Intro to religious studies” at a local college and
the following might only be Samaels’ subconscious mind’s attempt to combine all the
information. It might just as much be the word of OUC.
The following was told to Samael in a low falsetto voice, in his(er) head, in Spring 2009, though
it has also been reordered during hypnotic sessions.
“It should be translated to modern language regularly; as necessary, to avoid misunderstanding.”
The Oath of Human citizenship or The Decree of Buddhist Mentalism:
Each of the section that follow should be meditated on often.
On the meaning of life:
Everyone must leave something behind when (s)he dies. Something that his or her hands have
formed in some way so that his or her soul has somewhere to go when she or he dies; if his or her
work is not yet done. It doesn’t matter what he or she does, as long as he or she has changed
something from the way he or she found it; it’s preferable that it be of benefit to that which is left
behind. The difference between a man making a meal and a cook preparing a masterpiece of
flavor- “feast?” is in the preparation of the said meal.
Stuff your eyes with the marvels of the world and live as if you were about to die at any moment,
in that you live every moment to its fullest. Do harm to none and no harm will befall you unless
it is necessary. Typically, the necessary or unavoidable occurrences of the world are beyond
rational thought. Trying to explain the negatives of the world, in anything besides an unbiased,
rational, data reliant, way, is a wasted pursuit. Respect, observe, and maintain the world, for it is
rare and it will be depleted too soon.
To assume security or guarantee for anything is to act as the carrion. The carrion, which has
become ineffective, thus entitled to nothing, does nothing, except nourish those which come after
it. So treat the dead as the carrion. Its’ accomplishments must be built upon, while its’ mistakes
quickly forgotten and/or mitigated.
Instead be like the vulture and live off the fruits of the carrion’s material being. To do so is to
honor the memory of its past energy and to ensure the legacy and its’ labor(s) reach fruition and
are able to endure/persist; rather than be lost; to time.
On Suicide:
Since all life is considered sacred, death itself should be avoided to the extent that is possible.
However, because every human is entitled to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, if a

human decides that they would be happier dead, then aren’t they entitled the right to commit
suicide in their pursuit of happiness; or only once they’ve reached a particular age?
On truth:
Before one can really make an analysis of truth one must consider its sources. Does truth pertain
more to what we each hold in our own hearts, what the majority believes, or by measuring the
most present opinion of society? Ultimately, one must make that decision for themselves, but it
is only in each person’s heart that truth can reside. Historical facts are undeniable, but the
question must always be, have we learned from our past experience(s)? If not, how can we act in
a way that reflects the experience(s) we have had, towards improving reality?
Human lives Matter:
Given that there is inherently discrimination when humans are involved, the assimilation of all
races of human, might be the only way we as a species can work together toward the betterment
of the whole. Similarly, the beliefs of certain groups that they are more discriminated against
than others, even when true, separates further the idea of a universal humanity. Whether in white
supremacy shouting, “Whites are superior and increasingly discriminated against.”, or the
African call of, Black Lives Matter, until we recognize that we all matter, and the heralding cry
of humans becomes Human Lives Matter, there will continue to be major impediments to the
construction of peace among all humans.
On Mental Health: The mental health crisis facing humanity is especially pronounced in
system(s) without universal healthcare. The medicine only approach doesn’t seem to be reducing
the problem, as a supplement to medication-based treatment, certainly, etiquette classes to
address autism and cognitive retraining to address depression and anxiety can’t be less likely to
reduce the problem(s) of mental healthcare.
First, etiquette classes would help to combat the atrocious influence media, social media,
and the exposure to the internet has had on human behavior. Additionally, the effect of autism,
once known as, “being socially awkward”, could be addressed by such instruction. Especially
since many people with autism are usually quite intelligent. Thus, the following types of
etiquette ought to be provided. Dining, respect/manners/situational appropriateness, conversation
skills, types of consent/full consent confirmation, proper behavior to build confidence, crisis
prevention and management, and body image acceptance. Using these behavioral learning
strategies is likely to reduce dependence on medicine, which is often expensive and inspires
anxiety anyway.
Second, Cognitive retraining or the alteration of a person’s own perception of upcoming
or past events. Example, a person with anxiety is more likely to have an inner monologue which
is negative expectation expression. Depression too can be partially explained, by this reasoning
and the common addition of lack of confidence. Mental thought association retraining might be
the best strategy.
The simple way to explain Mental thought association is as keyword replacement. Rather than
thinking of a coming social event as an overwhelming scenario in which you’ll be judged or
unaccepted/shunned, the keywords or thoughts associated with those coming events could be
changed or re-associated as a common gathering of peers, in which perspectives shared can be
discussed not judged, and acceptance is likely given the confidence this mental association
retraining would provide.
Another example is depression, the chemical imbalance theory has not been able to be absolutely
reaffirmed, rather than find the right theory, the old one is perpetuated in the name of retrieving

sunk cost. Oh, Capitalism! The mental association approach might be effective with depression
also. Keyword shifts, instead of an inner monologue of “I’m depressed, I’m unemployed, I’m an
ex-con, people don’t like me/I have no friends, I love (name drug here),etc. The feelings of
helplessness and low self-esteem and confidence, incited by these types of thoughts, can be
reversed by changing the associations in one’s inner monologue. If those statements/associated
thoughts were changed to “happy/positive” one’s such as; I’m not in a good mood, I’m going to
find a job, or at least hobby/new activities, and people, I’ve been rehabilitated/I’m much better
off now, and people will like me once they get to know me, then a person’s association with new
thoughts and keywords will make them happy thus reducing their depression and creating fresh
positive thoughts, memories, and associations.
Keywords:
Negative: pain, failure, ex-con, unemployed, disabled, infected, etc..
Positive: temporarily hurting, success, rehabilitated/ learned my lesson, I’m applying to
jobs/making progress, I’m still healing. They already found the cure just have to wait for a FOIL
request in 30 years.
On others’ beliefs:
Ultimately, what a person chooses to believe and assimilate into their life is entirely that
individual’s decision. However, one cannot be judged in a way that does not include their past
actions. For it is there past actions that demonstrate how they act based on their beliefs and
experiences. Therefore, it is necessary to have patience with all other beings and to refrain from
infringing your belief system upon them. However, informing them of your belief system on an
intellectual basis is commendable and may help them on their journey, which sometimes requires
repetition.
On imagination:
Samael has observed that the difference of meaning in time periods of a language might be the
imagination aspect of religion that makes people so attracted to it. The difference between the
meaning of “this” in 70AD was so much more vague compared with “this” as a refractive
pronoun now, is such that the room for interpretation inspires extremism, violence, and
intolerance, because of the difference in more recent versions by ever more recent prophets.
Perhaps the Japanese had one of the first incarnations of Samael.
On Royalty:
There is a theory that lottery as a fund raising method was begun well before humans began
having currency. f the individual born into enlightenment were all to win the biggest in history
back to back the only times they play, The androgynous form that was able to receive those
winnings chose to turn it into a community provision, decency, society model with the
expectation that such an individual would only ever occur again with that royal families
offspring. Might these royals then only have been the families that resulted from the incarnation
of a bodhhisatva winning the lottery thus being in the image of as well as having the luck of what
must be OUC. In this way Samael’s story seems similar yet, Samael’s is not yet royalty Oh,
capitalism.
On “our origins”:
Genesis: Though humans don’t understand the complete properties of antimatter matter and dark
matter, yet, this would suggest that in theory, if given infinite time, two “masses” of dark matter
might collide. Consider that in the beginning the was only darkness (dark matter) or that in one
wide spread event individual dark matter atoms simultaneously collided. Might this have been
dubbed the big bang? And would the collision of dark matter with itself produce only matter and

energy (ever expanding). Exactly, how this played out might only be able to be explained by
further study of each of the parts involved.
In the event that the system was designed to or is only able to behave at a particular
speed/rate, the creation of particle accelerators might be affecting time. Avoid speeding up what
little time we have! (playing God, damn humans!)
There have been scientific experiments to determine how RNA, the predecessor to DNA
first became self-replicating. In a controlled setting dirt, sand, and soil molecules if assembled in
the right way, saturated by water and then electrified (simulated lightning strike) will
spontaneously begin to self-replicate. If science can explain and reproduce this experiment, the
presence of a designer of the conditions necessary to have allowed it, is not required, though
there might have been.
What sets us apart from the other organisms on this planet? The simplest explanation is
that the ability to reason is what sets us apart from those animals around us, though we too are
just animals(mammals). Therefore, the mind, which allowed for this reasoning in the first place
sets us apart. So the mind has created everything that we now have. The values, beliefs, &
societies that exist are only products of the mind. The laws and moral codes humanity, generally,
holds in common are thus the product of our shared subconscious. The messiahs that have been
intrinsic to the varying institutionalized belief systems were only guides along the way to
complete balance of reason. If we desire to continue these belief system(s) we must let go of our
differences and incorporate the most important elements of each in order to maintain the stability
of our broader system(s).
Since there is little to no definitive proof as to whether or not Our Universal Creator, or Allah, or
Yakov or whatever you choose to call the divine power(usually portrayed as an entity) that may
or may not have created this place, exists; it is equally logical to say that the earth produced
humans. Therefore, we must care for our creator by caring for the earth. For perhaps humans
were merely the products of the essential creation of Our Universal Creator; the earth and
celestial heavens. Or just as likely, maybe there was no original designer.
On morals:
The world is only considered from a moral perspective after interpreting the stigmas that
humanity has developed toward certain, declaredly, deviant behaviors. Somehow, we have lost
our way, putting meaning where none should be seems like a sitcom trying to convince us it is
the only right way.
Indeed, we must not take instruction as to what our moral standard should be that is for each to
decide on their own. Placing great emphasis on chastity simply because our society is a
patriarchal one, and it is perceived that women need to be protected, is the result of those
religions that try to explain our creator as a male as well as the influence of women being the
only way to perpetuate the species. Understanding where our morals come from is just as
important as what those morals are. We have only the following words of advice:
Don’t look to the sky for answers until you put out the fire in your backyard.
Background and mental health checks for firearm purchases.
A flat tax, no exceptions.
Do harm to none unless it is necessary or accidental, and karma will treat you well.
Take care of the earth for that is all that we have by which to judge our potential creator and
existence itself.
Trust in science; it must be/can be repeated/tested!