This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
DarthInvader · 36-40, M
I think what you’re seeing with modern art is actually part of a cycle rather than just “decay.” Every art form tends to whittle down to its basics after a while, because the complexities have already been explored. Themes change, audiences change, and what’s considered meaningful or “good” shifts with them.
Take music for example, we moved from the harmonic density of jazz and the orchestral tradition into the more repetitive, groove-driven forms of pop, hip hop, and R&B. That doesn’t mean today’s music has no value, it just emphasizes accessibility, rhythm, and production instead of complexity in harmony. The same thing happens across all art, once the difficult heights are reached, there’s always a swing back toward simpler, more relatable expressions.
Complexity never disappears, it just moves into niches while the mainstream goes broad. So modern art isn’t really the death of art, it’s just the latest stage in that ongoing cycle.
Take music for example, we moved from the harmonic density of jazz and the orchestral tradition into the more repetitive, groove-driven forms of pop, hip hop, and R&B. That doesn’t mean today’s music has no value, it just emphasizes accessibility, rhythm, and production instead of complexity in harmony. The same thing happens across all art, once the difficult heights are reached, there’s always a swing back toward simpler, more relatable expressions.
Complexity never disappears, it just moves into niches while the mainstream goes broad. So modern art isn’t really the death of art, it’s just the latest stage in that ongoing cycle.
@DarthInvader That all sounds sensible enough.