This judge is very sus on why they seem to want to cover for a pig grapist.
A man graped a pig on a pig slaughter farm and the judge said since the act was only a few seconds, he shouldn't get any charges. The judge also wouldn't allow the evidence in court meaning the can't even show any footage that would be used to convict him.
I wonder if they use the same logic for rpe of humans too? Eh it only happened once, it was a one off it's okay 👍 👌
From the Farm Transparency Project on YouTube and they are just talking about the case where a judge says since the assault only happened for a few minutes and that it was a one off, that the guy won't be charged.
I dunno, I'm trying not to say it but highly sus on the judges part, only people that fkk animals on the down low want to not charge others for doing so as this is the only logical conclusion and I've ran many conclusions trying to understand this
[media=https://youtu.be/IDj_TrAJV0U?si=jPx4OFyG5TeBp2AY]
I wonder if they use the same logic for rpe of humans too? Eh it only happened once, it was a one off it's okay 👍 👌
From the Farm Transparency Project on YouTube and they are just talking about the case where a judge says since the assault only happened for a few minutes and that it was a one off, that the guy won't be charged.
I dunno, I'm trying not to say it but highly sus on the judges part, only people that fkk animals on the down low want to not charge others for doing so as this is the only logical conclusion and I've ran many conclusions trying to understand this
[media=https://youtu.be/IDj_TrAJV0U?si=jPx4OFyG5TeBp2AY]
36-40, F
