Update
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Decolonization remains an unfinished process, with its final phase yet to be fully realized.

In Chapter 3 of The Pitfalls of National Consciousness, Fanon says:


“The colonial world is a world divided into compartments, a world in which the colonized are consigned to the margins, their labor, their resources, and their very bodies exploited for the benefit of the colonizer.”

Today’s trade deals, where Africa’s raw resources are extracted, processed abroad partly by our own diaspora, and then sold back into African markets, extend colonial manifestations into the modern era. This exploitation is deepened when African made products are blocked from fair access to European markets, which I previously mentioned.

More than that, the presence of corrupt European corporations operating within Africa from various European countries, at times protected by their military and political interventions, reinforces this system of inequality, as they often work to maintain a structure that benefits their home markets while keeping African economies dependent again and again.

I saw these dynamics as always an intentional neocolonial scam from the European Union. But after engaging with a few works like Samir Amin's and south american studies, I now recognize that much of the problem is rooted in Africa's position as a peripheral economy within a global system built on longstanding structural inequalities. It is a byproduct, which is why it echoes in other dealings, even if to a far smaller extent.

This change of thought doesn’t change the solution nor the reality. Whether export-import trade exploitation specifically is intentional or structural, or both, the practical answer remains the same: Africa must break away from its codependence on Europe.


Until Europe creates a truly fair environment for African economies, a transformation that could take decades or never happen in fact, irrespective of the prevailing political power, our focus must shift to domestic reforms and forging stronger ties within Africa and with emerging partners in Asia. We must embrace African partnership and initiatives like the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA) to build a more selfreliant and equitable future. And we must emphasize on technological exchanges for any dealings that compromise our raw materials and/or our human resources.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
WintaTheAngle · 41-45, M
They have no intention whatsoever of the financial decolonisation of Africa and you know it. There’s no incentive.

The African governments and economic systems are so saturated with legacy of it that they couldn’t stop it even if they tried.

And the most powerful African corporations and powerful individuals won’t even try. Because they benefit from the existing system, not by much but by just enough not to resist it.

It’s a decided matter.
Miram · 31-35, F
@WintaTheAngle The shift is in its early stage and is gradual, but it is already taking place in several countries. There is political willingness. Hence why there is also a struggle between France and Germany over market sacricity in the European union. The boost will be slow but significant enough to get rid of much of the codependence, as long as military interventions in those countries where it started won't take place.

The African development bank estimates that, if fully implemented, the AfCFTA alone could add over $1.5 trillion to Africa’s GDP by 2030, without actually accounting for other deals being discussed and studied in north african countries. And even if not fully implemented, partial implementation will give space for other initiatives.

I am a bit more optimistic, especially over regional changes, and with the course of the current policies.
WintaTheAngle · 41-45, M
@Miram That’s all lovely. It’s going to fail.

And you’re talking about 1.5 trillion when the system it’s up against generates 11.2 trillion, annually.

See me? I’m British. And my country is on its arse and going backwards. Some of the reason for that is the British government in its current form are economically inept.

But within Britain exists the City of London Corporation which owns almost a half of all the offshore banking and tax havens in the world.

Neither the British government, the EU, or even the UN can do anything about the City of London Corporation, because in one form or another they own these bodies or have enough influence to divert them elsewhere.

So I’m afraid what you’re feeling optimistic about is small potatos.

I will continue to be the most heavily taxed nationality in Europe while also paying the most for heating my home. While at the same time this organisation based an hours drive south of me will plunder every country including its own. And nobody can stop it.


And before you think it’s just Britain, there are other beasts of the same nature in the US, China and France and Japan.

At best you can hope to become a part of it and benefit somehow. And that’s a tiny fraction of 1% of people.
Miram · 31-35, F
@WintaTheAngle



And before you think it’s just Britain, there are other beasts of the same nature in the US, China and France and Japan.



I don't know why many of you westerners have the assumption that we Africans aren't familiar with capitalistic corporations and how capitalism generally functions.

You are not the first person who divert my threads to a condescending take. I rather focus my energy on actual works in the field, real outcomes as I see manifest in reality and in my own side of the world. I can't be wasting my time on why something can't happen when it is already taking place. I see chances and I support and empower them until/unless I am able of coming up of better solutions.
WintaTheAngle · 41-45, M
@Miram I think you might have misunderstood the tone of what I’ve said. I’m not being condescending, I was just being open about it.

No need for the “you westerners” I’m sure if I started referring to you as “you Africans” you’d probably have a sharp response for it.

I’m said the things I said because I respect you enough to be honest with you. If you were hoping for a nodding donkey response I’ll leave it there so someone can take that position.
Miram · 31-35, F
@WintaTheAngle

Alright, no more calling you a westerner.

I can elaborate as to why your reply is condescending , why the figure you provided and bringing up your own challenges in the UK are both unfitting arguments in this context, and to one partnership initiative being taken as ALL there iss to it, but that would be useless discussion I think. You formed conclusions already and this seems to be more of a desire to share them. I like my willingness to account for potential better.

Have a good day!