Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

I Find Politics Interesting

[b][u][center][big]The Clintons are exposed[/big][/center][/u][/b]

October 31, 2016, 05:06 pm
[b][center][big]Clinton Foundation memo reveals Bill and Hillary as partners in crime[/big]
[/center][/b]

Memo reveals interplay between Clinton Foundation, personal business
TheHill.com

Last week, WikiLeaks dropped a 2011 memo by top Bill Clinton aide Doug Band that lays bare Team Clinton’s sordid financial dealings when Hillary Clinton was secretary of State.

Band describes how the Clinton Foundation served as a conduit for what he called “Bill Clinton Inc.” — the former president’s for-profit arm. Other documents show State Department involvement.

[b]The result is an unsavory mix of charity work, profiteering, and pay-to-play politics that potentially reaches the highest levels of US foreign policy and screams for IRS and Department of Justice reviews.[/b]

At center is Band and his consulting firm Teneo. Band served as gatekeeper to all things Bill Clinton. Those wanting a former president as golf partner ponied up. Requests for Foundation dough followed. Next came Clinton Inc. — the steady stream of speeches, books, and honorary titles that enriched Bill Clinton. Teneo managed it all.

[b]Huge corporations and others seeking Clinton’s orbit lined up. Teneo’s clients included major U.S. corporations Coca-Cola and Dow Chemical, which donated huge sums.[/b]

[b]Foreign firms like UBS donated and greased Clinton Inc[/b].

For-profit Laureate International Universities went further, buying Clinton “advice” and rights to his prestige for $3.5 million annually. In all, Band states Teneo’s management yielded the former president $50 million — including a $2 million upfront slice of Band’s firm — with another $66 million queued. Band also facilitated political activity including securing campaign donors and managing Clinton’s political schedule.

Before daughter Chelsea Clinton intervened and ordered a compliance review, no one separated charity from profit-making time. Blurred lines were most blatant at the Clinton Global Initiative (CGI) — the annual confab where the world’s elite fete the former president and discuss world events.

This article comes from[b] The Hill[/b]

http://www.thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/presidential-campaign/303663-bill-and-hillary-partners-in-crime-literally
Northwest · M
Or, for an impartial review of the memo, as in not attempting to cherry pick out of context: http://politi.co/2dYEWs1
Northwest · M
@lov2smile:

1. It's Eureka not Urika.

2. Not only did you misspell it, but you completely missed my points.

I am not surprised (on both counts).

But I will agree with the first part of your erroneous (in whole) statement "You are voting for Hillary because of the way she will govern"

Why would I vote for her for anything else?

It's not like I am voting for someone, just because he's a white, sexist, bigoted, and xenophobe male.
lov2smile · 36-40, F
I've asked you to admit that numerous times and you have avoided it.
So what brings you around now?

Is it because you are embarrassed of your previous defense of Saint Hillary?
Northwest · M
@lov2smile: I have no idea what you think you made me admit. Based on your position, with Trump's values, mostly resembling yours, I can only assume that, like him, you fabricate stuff. Kind of like, when he said that he forced the President to release his long birth form, or when he said that Hillary invented Birthism, or when his campaign manager, claims that people who claim that Hillary won the first debate, were watching another debate.

Based on your entire history of lying, and inventing here, I will take this as yet another one of your lies and inventions.
"They" really don't know how to run a business otherwise they wouldn't have gotten caught. "They" don't know how to run a country or we wouldn't be in the mess we are in. And "They" are running the country ?

 
Post Comment