I Was Caned At School

@JoyEla i can see nothing wrong if a child is naughty giving its bottom a whacking. I have four conditions. Firstly it is fully deserved and the child knows why its bottom is being whacked. It must not be done to excess so becoming abuse. It must not be beyound the childs endurance. Lastly, for two reasons any whacking with an object or hand should be done on the childs bare bottom. The reasons are that the bottom does not have to be hit so hard as over clothing to generate the same sting so by being hit softer the sting is the same but the risk or amount of bruising is greatly reduced. Secondly it can be seen as to the effect the whacks are having on the botttom and the bottom is not being marked to excess. IKeeping these points in mind i cannot see any reason, why even a 15 year ld cannot be made to take his underpants down and have a sound whacking on his bare bottom.

@chikki I see both sides. I was abused in the home and it was to excess. I'd have to say about 20-30x with the belt a couple times a week was the norm. however, always over clothes. often times for things I didn't know I had done wrong. It was just random times and random reasons. sometimes no reason at all. so my view is a bit tainted in that regard. I have never spanked my child, nor has she ever needed it. she isn't naughty by nature, and often times a quick tongue, a disappointing tone with her is enough. As she gets higher in her teen years, if there is an issue, we will certainly not be allowing mouthy behavior to start.

@JoyEla what you goy was excessive and abusive use of corporal punishment. That can never be allowed or tolerated. This is not the same as giving a child a few moderate whacks on the bottom be it over pants or the bare bottom. When deserved i can see no reason why a child should not get a few moderate whacks across the bae bottom...no harm, if for reasonable punishment, insisting the bottom is bare for whacking