Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

I Fully Support Julian Assange And Everything He Stands For

Julian Assange Should Be Assasinated... Julian Assange, while professing to be a proponent of peace, is providing aid and comfort to terrorists in the war against Christianity, the Western World, and all things Not Islam. Julian Assange has thrown a monkey wrench into the often private, and frequently frank communications and discourse between nations that is necessary if the world is to find peace and maintain peace. The release of the documents instead of dropping bombshells that would terribly embarrass the United States, Mr. Assange's ob<x>jective, has instead demonstrated that the US State Department is more capable than many of us thought and the the US Government in general has been more honest and forthcoming than many of us believed -- some of those like myself who support a reasonable level of classification and secrecy in government.

What Julian Assange did in releasing hundreds of thousands of documents, to which he had no right and subsequent to requests and pleas from the US Government that he not release them, was nothing less than an act of war against the US. Those who wage war on the US should expect to face violent retaliation. Because Julian Assange is not a head of state, he can legally be assassinated by an executive Order of the US President under both US and International law. Personally, I hope that Julian Assange spends every moment of his life wondering if the cross hairs of an assassin are focused sharply between his eyes.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
conceptualclarity
As for "invasion and occupation of Afghanistan," the US in 2001 sent few troops into Afghanistan. We intervened almost exclusively with air power in Afghanistan's civil war on the side of a vastly better set of people, the northern Alliance, against the genocidal Taliban regime. It has since then been necessary to send a lot of troops to Afghanistan but that country has never been under our "occupation," (which would include running the country). We helped liberate the country, and a fair number of other countries have joined us in holding up the military end of Afghanistan.

In Iraq, we turned the government back over to the Iraqis a long time ago, and even before then when there was an occupation, the US allowed the Iraqis to block the stationing of Turkish troops in Iraq, which we were in favor of. And the Iraqis were allowed to pick a leader for the first post-occupation government who was not the one we were hoping for. so things are much different from how you portray them.