Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

I Fully Support Julian Assange And Everything He Stands For

Julian Assange Should Be Assasinated... Julian Assange, while professing to be a proponent of peace, is providing aid and comfort to terrorists in the war against Christianity, the Western World, and all things Not Islam. Julian Assange has thrown a monkey wrench into the often private, and frequently frank communications and discourse between nations that is necessary if the world is to find peace and maintain peace. The release of the documents instead of dropping bombshells that would terribly embarrass the United States, Mr. Assange's ob<x>jective, has instead demonstrated that the US State Department is more capable than many of us thought and the the US Government in general has been more honest and forthcoming than many of us believed -- some of those like myself who support a reasonable level of classification and secrecy in government.

What Julian Assange did in releasing hundreds of thousands of documents, to which he had no right and subsequent to requests and pleas from the US Government that he not release them, was nothing less than an act of war against the US. Those who wage war on the US should expect to face violent retaliation. Because Julian Assange is not a head of state, he can legally be assassinated by an executive Order of the US President under both US and International law. Personally, I hope that Julian Assange spends every moment of his life wondering if the cross hairs of an assassin are focused sharply between his eyes.

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

Lickitysplit · 70-79, M

In response to soursweet -- I did not and do not call for murder or any other individual act of violence against anyone. What I did call for was for a sovereign nation, the United States, to act in its own behalf in response to what I personally believe was an act of war that gives aid and comfort to the terrorist enemies of the United States.

Furthermore, you must be smart enough to recognize hyperbole when you see it. I intentionally made a provocative and hyperbolic statement as a means of emphasizing to people who refuse to see, that the acts of Wikileaks and Julian Assange are serious acts that intentionally sought to do damage to my country, in fact were acts of war, and are deserving of an aggressive response appropriate to an act of war. Additionally, my encouragement to my Government to act was made in the full knowledge that the current administration of President Barrack Obama would not act aggressively and would act only through the courts.

In response to wannashareit -- The terrible act of criminal violence committed in Arizona this weekend were the individual acts of a man who is insane and acted out of his paranoid psychosis. No conservative, Republican, Tea Partier, or anyone else encouraged or caused him to commit his criminal, nor did they or we encourage any act of violence. Again, those of you on the left who are smart enough to understand the difference between political rhetoric, hyperbole, and encouragement to violence know that we did not encourage any such act and choose to use a tragedy for your own political aims.