Asking
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Could America defeat the rest of the world if no nuclear weapons were allowed?

I just watched a youtube video on it and I believe it. America has a lot of weapons.
SW-User
I think the east has a lot of surprises up their snatch
FreestyleArt · 31-35, M
If China estimated it will take 15 years to over power the U.S. with all aspects. The Economy. Currency. Stronger Relations with Global Trade. Stronger Policies. Powerful Military. Space Control. Better Education. Infrastructures. Better homeland Security. Better Hospitals. The best Agricultural and Industrials. The Best Resources

It will still take a lot for China to get there.

Which tells me Russia is still considered the second rank behind U.S.


Even the U.S. is Hurting badly but it will take a lot
spjennifer · 56-60, T
We do have a lot of weapons but not that much population, depends on what kind of war it is too. Between China and India they have almost half the worldwide population, we have barely 10% of that. Wars are not won by weapons alone, as the Germans learned in WWII, you need food, fuel, materials to win a war and you need to be able to get all of those to the battlefield too.
chrisCA · M
@spjennifer You also need the will to fight.
spjennifer · 56-60, T
@chrisCA That too 😊
Adstar · 56-60, M
Maybe 50 years ago when the USA had the industrial and manufacturing mass production capabilities to replace the expected losses of weapons and equipment in a war the USA may have had a chance to win a world war..

But today when that vast industrial complex has been shut down and transferred to China and some other countries.. Nope the USA would not have a chance today of defeating the rest of the world.. Yeah initially it would expand and have a few wins but the weight of industrial capacity of the world would replace the initial losses and then overwhelm the ever reducing US forces who will be unable to replace their losses of critical platforms..
Adstar · 56-60, M
@questionWeaver Well we wiill simply have to disagree on this one questionweaver..
@Adstar I NEVER AGREE TO DISAGREE

That IS BRITISH, I AM AMERICAN

We REJECTED EVERYTHING BRITISH in 1776

Let us just part
Adstar · 56-60, M
@questionWeaver Ok we shall part then.. in disagreement.. Such is life..
Your asking if America could stand the rest of the world converging on it by sea and land and the sky?

Heck I’m a gambler 🍿
We have the F35, AEGIS and F22s

It is unimaginable how somebody would thread through that
nedkelly · 61-69, M
FFS - they would be lucky to beat Canada
CreateTVT · 31-35, M
@nedkelly lol yeah right
This message was deleted by its author.
chrisCA · M
Ask the Vietnamese.
SW-User
CreateTVT · 31-35, M
[youtube=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1y1e_ASbSIE]
TheBannibalOne · 61-69, M
No,,some countries everyone would die if we are not beat.If it's in another country ,no way.
hippyjoe1955 · 61-69, M
America is losing the war now and not a gun or bomb is being used.
cycleman · 61-69, M
there isn't an ending with the US concerns
MethDozer · M
If we wanted to? Likely yes. The amount of arms and their capabilities is pretty top notch. However The US hasn't tried or wanted to win a war in a long, long time. That isn't the purpose anymore. With Military-industrial complex we have in place victory isn't the prime objective. The wars themselves are the prime objective and by and large the motivation is to keep the war going in the name of arms profits. But on the same token there are few countries that can match our military hardware and expertise and of the two that do have comparable and in few examples better hardware we spend and stockpile so much more.
This message was deleted by its author.
SW-User
@MarmeeMarch chalie Zelenoff😍 my hero
This message was deleted by its author.
SW-User
@MarmeeMarch awww😞

 
Post Comment