Can you agree that Trump is being very noble about this change of power now?

@monte3 There was plenty of evidence of fraud. Big tech and the swamp took him down.

@puck61 If a sociopath says it. It must be true. And the lemmings follow

@jimjim1969 For the millionth time! Everything the dems t0uch turns to shit and everyone can see that.

@puck61 The “elite legal strike force record was 1 win 62 losses. 🤷‍♂️ Bill Barr stated there was not substantial fraud. 🤷‍♂️ Twice the Supreme Court rejected suits, all 9 justices! The Republican Govenors of AZ and GA defended their states elections🤷‍♂️
But most striking is listening to the odd call Trump made to the GA Sec. of State. Listen to it, listen to how weak Trump’s arguments are, pathetic really, and how easily they are swatted awAy with facts. Sorry the election was legit, trump claiming otherwise doesn’t change that.

@monte3 When the evidence isn't even examined, and the case summarily dismissed without being heard, that's not a loss - it's a miscarriage of justice.

Let's take a look at the evidence. Shine a bright light on it. When Bill Barr says there was not substantial fraud, I don't find that comforting.

It sounds to me like he also said, there was some fraud. I would like to know by whom! I would like those persons brought to justice, cuz even a little fraud is illegal. And, I'd rather know those bad actors are being punished instead of left to learn how to cover their tracks better next time.

@Budwick if he had ment there was “some” fraud he would have said that 🤷‍♂️ Just saying. Stop saying it wasn’t examined, hell what was it? You lost and lost pretty big, move on. Trump was never worth destroying democracy for anyway.

@monte3 The evidence was not heard in any court - not one.
To this day, no one has been shown the evidence.
It's all been suppressed.

You said "Bill Barr stated there was not substantial fraud." The implication is that there was [u]some [/u]fraud.
There's not supposed to be any.

@Budwick Court's hear evidence, over 70 judges said there wasn't any!!

@Harriet03 The evidence was never heard.

@Budwick and what WAS this missing evidence? Almost all the 62 losses in court were involving disenfranchising voters and not fraud because there was NO evidence that could stand up to the scrutiny that is required to prove that. Oh well your side has at least four years to find it.

@Budwick again: what was it? Where is this evidence hiding.

@Budwick No, that was the impeachment trial. You're getting confused dear!!

@Harriet03 I think we are y
Talking to a very sad brick wall here.
Let’s suggest places that 5he missing evidence could be. I think Tucker Carlson had it and lost it.
Or one of Lindsey Graham’s “gentlemen callers” too it from nightstand with the money...

@monte3 ikr? It's insane!

@Harriet03 insanity thy name is Budwick!
Or Jackbud as I call him...

@monte3 jMr Budwick is quite sane. I object vehemently to the ad hominem towards Budwick. He has chutzpa. He is one of the best א גוטער גוי on this site. I'm proud to have him as a friend.

@puck61 🙄 you really need to get out more hun!!

@puck61 Thanks Puck.

@Harriet03 Last night you wanted me 'in' and now you want me 'out'. You're such a chippy!

@puck61 Woman's prerogative.

@Harriet03 Well, I still love you anyway. I appreciate the twenty pounds you left on the dresser.

@puck61 Your wife left that for me!

@monte3 They disregarded the evidence because of fear civil unrest if the truth of Trumps actual win was put out there. They fraudulently put Biden in to keep the peace. I believe Trump actually won the election by a landslide. Everyone in the swamp was / is so scared of looting and burning and killing , they complete choreographed the election results for Biden, and Harris will be president within two years. Then the shit really hits the fan.

@puck61 [image deleted]

@Harriet03 😆