This post may contain Fetish content.
AdultFetish
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

I Think The Cane Should Be Bought Back Into The School System

I am a product of my upbringing and education - born in the 1950s, became a teenager in the mid-sixties, and a long-haired rebel at the start of the 1970s.....

When I was very young (5 or 6, maybe) my mother would occasionally slap us - I have 2 older sisters, who are two and three-and-a-half years older than me - but nothing more than that. At primary school persistent offenders would sometimes be punished in assembly - rulered on the hands and occasionally the legs, by the headmistress.
At the age of about 7, I moved to a small prep school just over 3 miles from home. To say the cane was used infrequently would be an understatement - I think I only ever heard the headmaster announce once in assembly that he'd caned some boys the previous day: for throwing stones. He was very solemn and said it was five years (if I remember correctly) since he'd last been obliged to use the cane.....

At Grammar School the cane was administered by the headmaster only - and always in the privacy of his study - although various teachers had a penchant for using a gymshoe in front of the whole class.

I was by no means a goody-goody but, on the other hand, I didn't court danger either - I went through the whole of my school career having suffered only a couple of rulerings on the hands at prep school and a couple of whackings with a gym shoe over PE shorts!

From my own experience I can say that I certainly approve of corporal punishment as a deterrent - overuse, however, I'm sure, lessens its effectiveness though. From a child's perspective, the playground whispers about getting the cane certainly added to the mystique......
Lynda70 · F
How effective was it really? At my school the cane was in regular use and not a day passed without there being several slipperings somewhere in the school.

Did it cease to be effective because it was used so much or was it used so much because it was ineffective? Perhaps it was a combination of both, not particularly effective and rendered less so through overs use - due to it not being effective in the first place.

Some schools explicitly exempted girls from CP. That amounts to an admission they had other methods they were absolutely confident would be so effective they would never need to use CP. Why use ineffective methods when you have far better methods available?
ArtieKat · M
@Lynda70 In my own case I think the deterrent factor worked. And, of course, I can only talk from personal experience.
Lynda70 · F
@ArtieKat I agree it probably worked in some cases but that doesn't mean other methods wouldn't have worked. It didn't work for my peers or me, possibly partly through over use. My husband says it didn't really work for him and his peers, possibly for the same reason.

CP has also been shown to cause serious psychological harm and, in a lot of case, was used to cover up abuse. I think the downsides outweight the possible benefits.

Consensual CP between adults is a different matter.
SW-User
I can understand your point of view but must say, though I highly regret the lack of god manners nowadays (to say the least), corporal punishment only brings resentment.....tks for your time to post here...
SimplyTracie · 26-30, F
I am 100% in disagreement. :(
sweetlotus · 51-55, F
I would never let anyone else spank one of my girls. Though my husband and I do believe in spanking at times.
@ArtieKat: Did you ever have writing an exact image of a dictionary page as a detention penalty? Turning yourself into a copy machine?
ArtieKat · M
@Alfred22: No - just "lines": the same sentence over and over.....
Ah, but you can put yourself on auto-pilot when writing the same line over and over again. Copying accurately a lot of phonetic pronunciation symbols and other details requires one to focus. Much more of a penalty. It forces you to do work that you have to pay attention to in order to get it done.
ArishMell · 70-79, M
The schools I attended from 1950s-60s used physical punishment only rarely, perhaps as a last resort, and didn't seem to have much trouble keeping order. In my 7 years at a large local-authority, mixed grammar (about 1100 pupils) I heard of only about four canings, and saw only about two or three boys have a whack from the plimsoll. (Did PE Teachers of that era receive special training in applying plimsolls to pubescent posteriors alongside gymnastic and athletic skills?)
SimplyTracie · 26-30, F
Yes and I don't think it should be part of today's culture.
LikeMind · M
@artiekat, fair enough. I'm like you I'm holding my water on a number of subjects.
smiler2012 · 56-60
yes I totally agree with what you say it was used when I was at school too and as you comment it is also there as a deterrent to encourage good behaviour alas in my opinion it was only stopped by two elements the over zealous teachers and the do gooders who use that as an excuse to have it stopped
ArtieKat · M
Thanks for your comment,LadyHeartnMind. I'm unsure whether you are speaking from personal experience when you say: "corporal punishment only brings resentment"? Although my schooldays are a long, long time ago, I don't remember any of us feeling particularly aggrieved.
LikeMind · M
Which senior school were you at ?
I think it would be a good idea, if the student could make the decision:

1)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xaay5gCuyjw

2)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MbRHNGNxSlM
ArtieKat · M
@Louise, as I said in a comment to SimplyTracie, times were different when we were growing up - some things have changed for the better, others not...
ArtieKat · M
@LikeMind: When PMs on this site are operational I'll be happy to answer that - at this stage I'm too shy to show too much of myself publicly.
ArtieKat · M
Times were different, Tracie......

 
Post Comment