Top | Newest First | Oldest First
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
Scores are structured to form a normal distribution around a mean of 100, with a standard deviation of 15
As a result:
66% of the population will score from 85 to 115
95% of the population will score from 70 to 130
99% of the population will score from 55 to 145
Half a percent will score above and below 3 standard deviations, but that has no statistical significance... it falls into the noise created by trying to measure a poorly defined concept (intelligence) using a coarse testing instrument
As a result:
66% of the population will score from 85 to 115
95% of the population will score from 70 to 130
99% of the population will score from 55 to 145
Half a percent will score above and below 3 standard deviations, but that has no statistical significance... it falls into the noise created by trying to measure a poorly defined concept (intelligence) using a coarse testing instrument
OogieBoogie · F
@newjaninev2 not to mention there are a variety of IQ tests tjat have different numeric measures .
One test has a max of like 162 or so , and another of 182...yet there are people who have scored over 200🤷♀️
One test has a max of like 162 or so , and another of 182...yet there are people who have scored over 200🤷♀️
SW-User
Well my asvab I took in the Navy was 83 but I didn't try really so I'm probably smarter than I think I am.
OogieBoogie · F
Ugh.....theu are not much more than the intellectual equivalent of arm wrestling competitions.
They dont really measure IQ....all theu can do is give you an indication of wjere your strengths and weaknesses are.
And they don't even touch on people skills, life smarts or intuition .
They dont really measure IQ....all theu can do is give you an indication of wjere your strengths and weaknesses are.
And they don't even touch on people skills, life smarts or intuition .
View 5 more replies »
OogieBoogie · F
@SW-User huh....ive not ever seen this .
I'm not sure id believe a questionnaire would be accurate because it depends on the people around you.
Everyone has a different agenda, goal, background and personality type . One influences different people different ways .
Honestly...for someone to think they can define this to a quotient is rather arrogant.
I'm not sure id believe a questionnaire would be accurate because it depends on the people around you.
Everyone has a different agenda, goal, background and personality type . One influences different people different ways .
Honestly...for someone to think they can define this to a quotient is rather arrogant.
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
OogieBoogie · F
@SW-User that makes some sense.
Still I'm dubious that they'd cover all parameters.
These are usuayly tests designed by intellectual, for intellectuals.
I today agree tjey can only show weaknesses and strengths....but they aren't good for true reality situations.
People flex and bend on a daily basis....the sheer variables in human interaction are incredibly vast.
I can't believe this is actually a test!
The sheer fact that it has to be , only shows the incompetence of people to use the very skills their testing!🤣😅😁
Still I'm dubious that they'd cover all parameters.
These are usuayly tests designed by intellectual, for intellectuals.
I today agree tjey can only show weaknesses and strengths....but they aren't good for true reality situations.
People flex and bend on a daily basis....the sheer variables in human interaction are incredibly vast.
I can't believe this is actually a test!
The sheer fact that it has to be , only shows the incompetence of people to use the very skills their testing!🤣😅😁
assemblingaknob · 26-30, F
Probably me. Never taken the test but I'm sure it's under 100
Iwillwait · M
I'm prolly rid'n 89.
OogieBoogie · F
@uncalled4 hahahaha🤣
Donotfolowme · 51-55, F
Mine is in minus