Top | Newest First | Oldest First
whowasthatmaskedman 路 70-79, M
I think its a total afront to Disney customers to ask for a pay for view of ANY kind when you have already paid to subscribe. If their stuff is that good, then let them charge more for site access and be done with it. Selling up in this situation is a blatent rip off.馃樂
Madhatter 路 31-35, M
@whowasthatmaskedman It wasn't originally supposed to be released on the streaming service at all. It was meant to go to theaters, so they're trying to make back those hundreds of millions they spent to make it. Still, that price seems way too high. $10 or $15, maybe, but damn.
whowasthatmaskedman 路 70-79, M
@Madhatter I get it.. A lot of genuine Block busters are being held over until this settles. It does kind of make you wonder about Mulan. Maybe its a stinker...馃樂
Madhatter 路 31-35, M
@whowasthatmaskedman Oh, I was counting on it. So far none of the live-action Disney remakes have been amazing, in my opinion.
FaeLuna 路 31-35, F
Wow that's dumb. If anything, I'll just wait until it's free on Disney+ in like a year or so, if I remember at all. I'm really not into the live-action remakes.
Although $30 would be basically 2-3 tickets at a normal theater, so a family would pay that much to begin with. I can see why they would price it there. Still though, charging a premium for one movie on top of a subscription? That's harsh.
Although $30 would be basically 2-3 tickets at a normal theater, so a family would pay that much to begin with. I can see why they would price it there. Still though, charging a premium for one movie on top of a subscription? That's harsh.
Spoiledbrat 路 F
I saw the cartoon. Is it racist that I pointed that out???
Madhatter 路 31-35, M
@Spoiledbrat Now you're just being silly. :)
SW-User
rich people with spoilt kids
ElsaKaren 路 F
why not just charge a modest $5 fee?