Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

I Am An Mra

News just in;

"Yes avfm ( a voice for men) is strongly opposed to marriage because the institution of marriage is nothing more than slavery for men. The same can be said for.having children. Father a child in this gynocentric feminist culture is about as smart as playing ba<x>seball with a live grenade. Marriage is worse. Most MRAs who aren't already married vow to never do so. This is why MRAs and MGTOWs are so close. We share that same philosophy."

This kind of puerile crap is exactly why the MRA is a hate group. It attacks fathers and marriage. What exactly does it stand for in a positive way, I wonder?

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

westsideblues1

*** example: Here is a case where a custody dispute was entertained*** .................................................................................................................

you can not use "ONE" example to use as a go to guide on how custody suits are disputed !..................... every case is different! depending on many variables.There are ground rules but, after that , like i said, the situation of that particular case, age of children, any special needs of the children?..... who/ where the children feel most comfortable with, which parent has the thickest wallet, how many children are in the family, ........ courts look at the parents relationship, do they get along well enough to co- parent, to care for the children, which parent will be able to spend quality time to support the children. there are some courts who wont allow one or the other parent to leave the state with any of the children. and the list goes on!!

bluelady1021

So very true lovefem. An MRA can search high and low for a case where a man seemed (I say seemed because sometimes there is a valid reason) to be treated unfairly and unjustly by the courts, but it is not the norm, and it does not happen regularly. We can also post cases where the same kind of thing has happened to women. It sometimes happens to PEOPLE and not just men.
There have been several situations where men came to my husband to ask for his help claiming that they were treated unjustly by the courts because, like the case JB mentioned below, the courts did things like awarding sole custody of the children to the wife and ordered the husband to pay a significantly large amount of money to her. Upon looking into it further my husband found that there were absolutely valid legal reasons why the courts had done so, and he advised these men that as a result he could not appeal their cases. It has also happened a few times with women.
Quite often people will not understand why the courts do what they do, and will just be angry because they have been ordered to do something that is absolutely valid, but that they don't think is fair and don't want to do. Women will rarely ever publish and share information about this kind of thing when it happens to them, but I have seen that men do it quite a bit and when they do so they often will convolute things, and leave things out that will make it clear why the courts did what they did to try to make everyone think they were treated unfairly and that the courts are biased against men, and that women regularly get the better deal in divorces which is not true. They will do all they can to try to make it seem like they were treated unfairly when they actually weren't. They have pity parties and play the "oh woe is me" role. The problem they often encounter is when people find out the truth about what actually happened. Then they will run away and hide, or continue to try to make it seem like the truth actually isn't true. Its foolish because when people do this they lose their credibility and other people don't want to deal with them anymore.