Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

I Am An Mra

News just in;

"Yes avfm ( a voice for men) is strongly opposed to marriage because the institution of marriage is nothing more than slavery for men. The same can be said for.having children. Father a child in this gynocentric feminist culture is about as smart as playing ba<x>seball with a live grenade. Marriage is worse. Most MRAs who aren't already married vow to never do so. This is why MRAs and MGTOWs are so close. We share that same philosophy."

This kind of puerile crap is exactly why the MRA is a hate group. It attacks fathers and marriage. What exactly does it stand for in a positive way, I wonder?

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

Mikemcneil · 61-69, M

"The act of "asking" to be a part of the child's life cost 10s of thousands of dollars. Most men who have.just lost everything he owns and is forced to pay 1/2 to 2/3s of his income to the woman that has just taken everything he owns can't afford to to spend the thousands of dollars to "ask" the court to be a parent. "

Another of Jack's made up statements. It doesn't cost "tens of thousands of dollars" to apply for a custody hearing or actually turn up for one.

There are no cases he can quote where a father has financially "lost everything" and been made to pay over 50-66 percent of his income to his divorced spouse. The rules are set by the legal system. Jack of course believes that the courts in the US are making divorced fathers homeless on a daily basis.

bluelady1021

So very, very true mike. Almost every state in the US has uniform guidelines relating to divorce cases to try to ensure that each spouse will get 50% of the jointly held money and assets, and will only have to pay an amount of support that they can afford without becoming impoverished. It is a well known fact, as I posted below and provided links that point this out, that the majority of men actually become richer after divorce, and the majority of women become impoverished for various reasons, but mainly because they are given primary custody of their children by their husband, and as a result they devote the majority of their time and energy to their children, while the father can devote more of his time and energy to his job, and less to his family.
http://www.legalzoom.com/marriage-divorce-family-law/divorce/men-v-women-who-does.

As the article states: "Ultimately, the overall economic quality of a man's life, based on earnings and amount spent on living expenses, increases after his divorce. He continues to earn more but bears fewer family expenses. The overall economic quality of a woman's life, post-divorce, decreases."

As I indicated above, it is so irritating to have to continuously factually prove that the things that JB writes that he just makes up because he wants to believe them, or has bought into them due to AVfMs bullshit, are usually not true. He need to do research on objective, non-gender biased websites instead of just believing Elam and other AVfMers totally biased nonsense.

westsideblues1

someoneisusingmyname is a another fake MRA!! ( he hates women) he called some one a liar then blocks them!!lol

typical

Mikemcneil · 61-69, M

Most divorced men are already in another relationship. Sounds like life served you some lemons and you ate them all without sugar, buddy? Your anecdotal bullshit is exactly that. Funny how it's all about the money with you guys. Nothing about the kids that you fathered in there, is there?