I Am An Mra

JB wrote: "It is obvious that ladyblu didn't read the link i posted. Unlike ladyblu the author of the blog used Vawa to prove her points. Not only did she make the state that Vawa is bias against men, she backed up her statement with references to the bill itself."

my response: I read the link, and the author of the blog is clearly very biased against women and feminism, and continuously spews her negatives views about us. She favors men over women, loves AVfM and its minions, and is an MRA honey badger.

http://breakingtheglasses.blogspot.com/p/whose-blog-is-this.html

http://manboobz.com/2014/01/25/mras-agree-female-humans-deadlier-cuter-than-males/

She continuously writes blogs and posts that attempt to make women (she calls them female humans) look evil, abusive, mean, onery, and manipulative, as so many women of her kind continuously do. I sometimes can't help but wonder if they do this to draw men in and get them to want them, because if they didn't most men wouldn't want them because they are unattractive and look kind of masculine.

Many of her "points" and interpretations of VAWA are incorrect because she clearly does not fully understand VAWA, or just wants to try to make it look biased against men when it isn't. She just took little snippets from the bill here and there, out of context, and interpreted them in a way to try to support her beliefs and opinion that VAWA is biased against men when it isn't.

If you can't find a link to a post or article that indicates that VAWA is biased against men which was written by someone who is objective, and isn't a biased, feminist/woman-hating, AVFMer or MRA, don't try to convince those of us who know that it isn't, that VAWA is biased against men. We aren't going to buy into the BS.

I will point out the reasons why that honey badger's beliefs and opinions about VAWA are incorrect later when I have more time.