I Am An Mra

Oh geeze, here JB goes repeating his lies and bullshit AGAIN after I have already addressed them. He has obviously ignored what I wrote or just wants to get a chubby by seeing me point out how wrong he is again, or he thinks that by just writing his nonsense over and over at the top of the story people won't recognize that I pointed out how wrong he is when I already addressed it when he wrote it down below. He is so annoying.

JB wrote: (I have) “said that a person cannot be an MRA and be a humanitarian. Yet she offers no evidence of any kind, let alone credible, that this is true.”

my response: I will repeat what I wrote in response to this lie AGAIN. I NEVER said that a person cannot be a MRA and a humanitarian. I already pointed out that saint wrote this and not me. Please stop lying about what I write JB. I also wrote below that I know that some MRA's are good people, and not just feminist-haters, who actually like women and don't have issues with them, and actually engage in activities to help men who are being treated wrongfully and/or unfairly.

He also wrote: "She also demands that I provide evidence that a person cannot be a feminist and a humanitarian and placed restrictions on what sources I can use as evidence.

my response: And I will write it again . . . provide actual factual PROOF that feminists are not humanitarians who promote equality, instead of just providing your twisted opinions and beliefs, or those of other feminist hater/MRAs. Asking that you do not just provide opinions or beliefs, and instead provide actual factual evidence, is not placing restrictions on what sources you can provide as evidence, as you have falsely accused me of. Everyone who has even the smallest degree of intelligence knows full well that when someone writes blogs, articles, and posts that contain their opinions and beliefs that is NOT considered factual evidence or proof of anything. That is why, for instance, in newspapers and other sources of information, articles and stories are considered to contain factual information while editorials are known to contain opinions. He is probably getting a chubby by writing this nonsense that he knows I will spend time and energy pointing out is nonsense, and that is why he keeps doing this crap.

He wrote (with absolutely no proof whatsoever that it is true)” "a feminist (a group of people that has a proven track record of pushing for policies and legislation that removes rights from one group of people based solely on their reproductive organs). As you can see the two contradict each other. You can't be both."

my response: I have continued to ask you to provide actual factual proof (not MRA/feminist-hater blogs or posts that contain opinions and incorrect assumptions) that prove that feminists have pushed for policies and legislation that removes equal rights from men. You have continuously failed to do so. Feminists have continuously fought for equality, and not for the removal of any “equal” rights from men. If you consider men making more money than women who are doing the same job for the same company to be a "male right"; or the ability to force a woman to have a child when she has been impregnated by a man, but doesn't want to have the child, a "male right"; or men's ability to sexually harass women in the work place a "male right"; or an employer continuously promoting men while ignoring women who are doing a better job and have worked for the company longer a "male right"; or a rapist's ability not to be prosecuted for raping a woman a "male right"; or only men, and not women, being able to vote a “male right”; or only men, and not women, being able to own a business a “male right”; or husband's, but not wives, being able to own their property a “male right”; or only males, but not married females being able to be heirs a “male right”; or only men being able to have certain jobs a “male right”; or only males, but not females, being able to attend higher educational colleges a “male right”; or men being able to beat their wives without being prosecuted a “male right”; or women not being able to take birth control a “male right”; and similar types of male preference and female inequality that feminists have fought to correct, then you are absolutely right because feminists have fought for women, and not men, in those types of situations. However, if you consider those things to be rights that men should still be entitled to then you, and anyone else who thinks the same way, obviously does not believe in equality and clearly is not a humanitarian.

he wrote AGAIN: "Lets take a look at VAWA. Ladyblu has said that VAWA is gender neutral. But it isn't. Here is the proof.
http://breakingtheglasses.blogspot.com/2013/01/vawa-is-not-like-that.html?m=1”

And here is my response AGAIN: I am also surprised that people like JB think that blogs and posts that his fellow biased, feminist hating, MRAs write are actual proof of certain things. They aren't. They are often just their twisted, biased, delusional opinions and beliefs of laws and other things that they obviously don't fully understand, and obviously want to believe that they mean something that they don't (as I pointed out above most people know that opinions and beliefs are not actual factual evidentiary proof of anything). He is trying to claim that the link to the blog he posted below, and posted above again, is proof that VAWA isn't gender neutral when it is obvious that the person who wrote the post on that blog obviously doesn't fully understand the changes that have been made to VAWA over the years that have resulted in it being gender neutral. Our government officials have repeatedly pointed out that VAWA IS GENDER NEUTRAL!!!!, and anyone who is intelligent and knows how to decipher laws and legislation knows full well that this is true.

http://www.ncdsv.org/images
/FAQ_VAWA%20and%20Gender.pdf

Here is the link to my story where I addressed this issue:

http://www.experienceproject.com/stories/Know-Feminism-Is-The-Biggest-And-Most-Harmful-Hate-Group/3003494