Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

I Am An Mra

News just in;

"Yes avfm ( a voice for men) is strongly opposed to marriage because the institution of marriage is nothing more than slavery for men. The same can be said for.having children. Father a child in this gynocentric feminist culture is about as smart as playing ba<x>seball with a live grenade. Marriage is worse. Most MRAs who aren't already married vow to never do so. This is why MRAs and MGTOWs are so close. We share that same philosophy."

This kind of puerile crap is exactly why the MRA is a hate group. It attacks fathers and marriage. What exactly does it stand for in a positive way, I wonder?
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
JackBarnesMRA
In response to ladyblues assertions. No where above are women mentioned or even remotely alluded to. The statement was about the legal ramifications men face as a result of fatherhood and marriage.You are trying to make the above statement about women when clearly it is not.
JackBarnesMRA
has said that a person cannot be an MRA and be a humanitarian. Yet she offers no evidence of any kind, let alone credible, that this is true. She also demands that I provide evidence that a person cannot be a feminist and a humanitarian and placed restrictions on what sources I can use as evidence. A person cannot be a humanitarian (A person who believes in equal rights for all people) and a feminist (a group of people that has a proven track record of pushing for policies and legislation that removes rights from one group of people based solely on their reproductive organs). As you can see the two contradict each other. You can't be both. 
Lets take a look at VAWA. Ladyblu has said that VAWA is gender neutral. But it isn't. Here is the proof.
http://breakingtheglasses.blogspot.com/2013/01/vawa-is-not-like-that.html?m=1 
N.O.W. (National organization for women) is the largest feminist organization in the US. NOW opposes every single time a bill comes before a state legislature that would give father equal access to their own children. (simply type "national organization for women fathers rights" into Google for the evidence) Why? Because it would mean women would receive less money and because they are worried about fathers abusing their children even though fathers are less likely to abuse their children than mothers. Also let us not forget that when a woman can't afford to support her children the state gives her money. When a man can't afford to support his children the state throws him in prison. So the largest feminist organization opposes equal parenting protections for a person if that person has a penis because the people with a vagina will get as much money. This is what labyblu calls a humanitarian group. 
This is not to mention the death threats and acts of violence perpetrated by feminists against people that dare to.disagree with them. People like Erin Pizzey. Why?Because they were revealing the truth about domestic violence. They said that not only can men be victims and women be perpetrators but that the number of male victims are significant, nearly half. Those statements earned them death threats. They even killed Erin Pizzey's dog. 
Does this sound like a humanitarian movement? 
A totalitarian form of government or rule is a form of.government that silences all dissenting opinions or.political expressions. Remember feminism is a political movement.The Ryerson University student union recently passed legislation banning any ideas on gender that are not feminist in nature. °  5. The concept of misandry as it ignores structural inequity that exist between men and women 6. Groups, meetings events or initiatives [that] negate the need to centre women’s voices in the struggle for gender equity.”And group or events that think that misandry is a real thing and/or don't focus on women as being victims of gender discrimination are not allowed.Since when did humanitarian and totalitarian become the same thing? 
http://theeyeopener.com/2013/03/new-rsu-policy-challenges-new-mens-issues-group/ 

Ladyblu has also made the claim that MRAs have threatened feminists. Yet said feminists have never been able to provide evidence that these instances actually occurred. Are there one or two MRAs it their that have threatened people? Probably. But it isn't indicative to the majority of the movement. The violence that feminists engage in is a group effort. Just like the feminist group in Argentina and the European feminist group femen.
Mikemcneil · 61-69, M
Do you mean men married to men then Jack? Or fathers who had children by men? I think you are obviously talking about women, don't you? Your statement is obviously about women, whether you mention them or not. You are a husband and father, does that mean you are a slave twice other? What idiot could let that happen? Nobody would ever marry or have children if what you think and state is actually true. Some of us guys actually take marriage and fatherhood seriously, and support our responsible choices. Other guys want to be MGTOWs and support the "marriage strike" like you do. What did your wife say when you told her that, Jackie boy? Oh I forgot, you didn't tell her at all. You just whined away on your mobile laid up in a truck stop.
westsideblues1
HEY JACK ASS DUMMY HOW MANY TIMES DOES IT TAKE FOR YOU TO SEE WHAT HAS BEEN TOLD TO YOU MANY TIMES OVER THE LAST 3 YEARS!!! YOU ARE SO STUPID !!!! not only HAVE MRA threatened feminist .

BUT JACK BOY YOU HAVE THRATENED FEMINST BY WAY OF SHOT GUN AND THIER CHILDREN ....AND I WILL NOT LET YOU FORGET THAT, NO MATTER HOW MANY TIMES YOU TRY TO IGNORE THAT YOU HAVE !!! stupid fuck ..

I bet your one of those guys who stare at young girls when they walk by acting like ur raping them with ur eyes! if only you could drink from that well hu jack ass !!!
westsideblues1
we gave you screen shots of your own threats ,myself and many other have given you proof !! your as stupid as stupid does.