Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

I Am An Mra

News just in;

"Yes avfm ( a voice for men) is strongly opposed to marriage because the institution of marriage is nothing more than slavery for men. The same can be said for.having children. Father a child in this gynocentric feminist culture is about as smart as playing ba<x>seball with a live grenade. Marriage is worse. Most MRAs who aren't already married vow to never do so. This is why MRAs and MGTOWs are so close. We share that same philosophy."

This kind of puerile crap is exactly why the MRA is a hate group. It attacks fathers and marriage. What exactly does it stand for in a positive way, I wonder?

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

bluelady1021

JB wrote: "Ladyblu says that a person cannot be an MRA and be a humanitarian."

my response: Really? Where did I write that? I'm pretty sure that saintargentina is the one who wrote that. All I did was ask you to provide factual proof that feminists cannot be humanitarians and you have still failed to do so. Your continuous assertions that all feminist think and act alike is absurd. I can point out numerous things that Elam has written that clearly proves that he is not a humanitarian, however, I do not feel that all MRAs cannot be humanitarians since it is clear that some of them can (but obviously not you).

bluelady1021

And he has also accused me of calling NOW a humanitarian group when I have never done that. He also needs to realize that organizations (not only feminist organizations) support women having parenting rights because it is recognized that women are often better at caring for, and raising children, than men are. If he would take a look at his own wife he would recognize this. This groups don't opposes equal parenting protections for a person if that person has a penis because the people with a vagina will get as much money. It has nothing to do with money. It is about who will be the best caregiver for children. It is often recognized to be women, and quite often fathers will not even fight to get primary custody of their children because they don't want to be responsible for caring for them and raising them. They would rather just financially support them and get joint custody so they can hang out with them once in a while without having to be their primary caregiver. They would rather have their ex wife do that. My ex husband is a perfect example. It has also been proven that quite often men who fight for total or primary custody of their children do so not because they want to be the one to raise and care for their children, but because they don't want to have to pay child support.

Mikemcneil · 61-69, M

Jack has stated many times he does not believe in alimony or child support payments. He has stated he would put children up for adoption if neither of the parents wanted custody. That is insulting to all men who genuinely want access and custody. He talks of "financial abortion" without explaining what he means. Money is just one of his idols.

westsideblues1

yea that's why he stays on the road away from his family so he doesn't have to divorce his wife, and pay her and their child any kind of support . little does he realize he pays them no matter what the situation is .

bluelady1021

Money is just one of his idols because he obviously doesn't make very much, but wishes he did - LOL. Guys like him who are never satisfied with their life, or the world, are always going to be unhappy and miserable (and they often end up engaging in criminal activity too).