Top | Newest First | Oldest First
MarkPaul · 26-30, M
It's not that it's immoral. It's that it is a fake solution with a dishonest payment scheme.
View 1 more replies »
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
MarkPaul · 26-30, M
@Razorback That's the heart of the matter. I don't think it's okay AND I don't believe (in fact, I know and challenge your belief to the contrary) a wall of 2000 miles, 900 miles, 500 miles that is concrete, that is a fence, that is a steel-slat structure, that is see-through, that is concrete, that Mexico will pay for, that Mexico won't pay for, that Mexico will pay for indirectly will change public services going to non-citizens. In summary and to be clear, I don't believe the gutless and failing Baby-trump is telling the truth about the wall now, just like he wasn't telling the truth about the size and the payment for the wall before.
Now, let's focus on the real issue and instead of looking for a simple symbol, let's come up with a real solution to a real problem and forget about scoring cheap political points.
Now, let's focus on the real issue and instead of looking for a simple symbol, let's come up with a real solution to a real problem and forget about scoring cheap political points.
hippyjoe1955 · 61-69, M
How did you reach that conclusion?
hippyjoe1955 · 61-69, M
@Razorback I have walls and doors in my house so.... Draw your own conclusion.
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
hippyjoe1955 · 61-69, M
@Razorback Doesn't explain your conclusion. Explains your state of mind.
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
SW-User
It's unfeasible, not immoral.
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
WoodyAq · M
How so?