We can observe evolution happening before our eyes.

That's why creationists had to start calling it "micro evolution" and acknowledge that it happens.

[youtube=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NArlXzSFt2Y]

Top | Newest First | Oldest First

SW-User

Evolution within a species or short period of time only [b]contribute[/b] to macroevolution. Without microevolution, macroevolution doesn't exist. The two do have differences because an entire group higher than species does not change just because one species may undergo microevolution

View 1 more replies »

SW-User

@Pikachu in reality, the classifications are like a house. Sure you got a pillar and some beams and walls but it's all evolution in the end

I see no reason to call it something different. Judt wanted to clarify why

Pikachu

@SW-User

Yeah i have no problem with that. My only problem with the term "mircorevolution" is that creationists use it as a tool to deny that evolution is happening at all.

newjaninev2 · 56-60, F

@SW-User There’s neither ‘micro-evolution’ nor ‘macro-evolution’.

To acknowledge one and to deny the other is like saying that you accept seconds, but deny minutes, and that neither can lead to hours.

There’s just time

There’s just evolution

Add a comment...