Top | Newest First | Oldest First
hippyjoe1955 · 61-69, M
Is there any real evidence or logic that indicates evolution is correct?
View 49 more replies »
@hippyjoe1955
[quote]What you are presenting is supposition not evidence[/quote]
This is your current favourite excuse. You've long since realized that you cannot actually debate the evidence for evolution with people who actually understand the subject and you seem to feel that your new silver bullet is pretending that the evidence is not evidence.
You are correct in saying that the evidence is an interpretation of the available data.
That's true.
But here's the thing, joe. Here's where your precious silver bullet turns back to lead: THAT IS WHAT EVIDENCE IS! It is an interpretation of data which consistently leads to the same conclusion. And you trust that method for treating disease and making technology and determining ancestry. You just choose to pretend that suddenly that very same method of deduction is no longer valid when it comes to evolution because you don't [i]want[/i] it to be true.
It's intellectually dishonest and logically indefensible.
You can prove this concept for yourself. Share with the class an example of evidence for [i]anything[/i] which is not in the end and interpretation of the data.
Or just ignore it because that's your favourite tactic when you don't have a good rebuttal.
We're all on to you , joe. We know what you are and how you work. You're not fooling anybody😁
[quote]What you are presenting is supposition not evidence[/quote]
This is your current favourite excuse. You've long since realized that you cannot actually debate the evidence for evolution with people who actually understand the subject and you seem to feel that your new silver bullet is pretending that the evidence is not evidence.
You are correct in saying that the evidence is an interpretation of the available data.
That's true.
But here's the thing, joe. Here's where your precious silver bullet turns back to lead: THAT IS WHAT EVIDENCE IS! It is an interpretation of data which consistently leads to the same conclusion. And you trust that method for treating disease and making technology and determining ancestry. You just choose to pretend that suddenly that very same method of deduction is no longer valid when it comes to evolution because you don't [i]want[/i] it to be true.
It's intellectually dishonest and logically indefensible.
You can prove this concept for yourself. Share with the class an example of evidence for [i]anything[/i] which is not in the end and interpretation of the data.
Or just ignore it because that's your favourite tactic when you don't have a good rebuttal.
We're all on to you , joe. We know what you are and how you work. You're not fooling anybody😁
hunkalove · 61-69, M
You don't have to prove a negative. You have to prove a positive. There is no evidence for Creationism, just a bunch of religious crap.
Jake966 · 56-60, M
No , they’ve been trying to disprove it for centuries
@Jake966
Carbon dating has proven to be accurate over and over again...just not when you try to use it to date anything over 50 000 years. Which is where other forms of radiometric dating come in.
But i'm sure carbon 14 is not your only reason for distrusting science. Do you distrust it to treat your illnesses? Make your technology? Is science unreliable when it tells you that you have 25% irish heritage or only when it tells you that you're related to chimps?
Carbon dating has proven to be accurate over and over again...just not when you try to use it to date anything over 50 000 years. Which is where other forms of radiometric dating come in.
But i'm sure carbon 14 is not your only reason for distrusting science. Do you distrust it to treat your illnesses? Make your technology? Is science unreliable when it tells you that you have 25% irish heritage or only when it tells you that you're related to chimps?
Deadcutie · 18-21, F
I think it takes the same faith to accept that a superior being created the universe from nothing as it does to accept something came from nothing naturally.... let me know when science finds out how life came into being...
Sarabee · 41-45
Let's see how old I am 😳20,000,0000,0000 years hmmm
Are u Celine
hippyjoe1955 · 61-69, M
@Dewms About as clueless.