Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

I have no idea what to make of Trump's airstrike.

Well its a slight lie. I'm confused and worried.

Without wanting to sound like Donald Rumsfeld; there are known unknowns. Mostly though there are unknown unknowns. The Syrian War is so complicated and with so many atrocities committed on all sides, its hard to know whether slapping down Asad is more likely to lead to peace or not. There are conspiracy theories that this is a Trump/Putin master plan to get The Donald off the hook with the FBI investigation and there are also theories that Trump changed America's entire foreign policy position after watching the evening news. They can not both be true but there may be some truth in one of them, or none of them. Is this a long-term strategy or a ridiculous off-the cuff impulse or somewhere inbetween? Will bombing Assad weaken his position or strengthen the resolve of Putin and he? I dunno.

I am hoping that this is some kind of bluff because nobody wants tensions to escalate between Russia and America. The best way to achieve peace would be negotiation and stopping arm shipments from Iran and Saudi. This has always been a proxy war for regional and global powers though with each of them valuing their own objectives more than Syrian blood. Asad wants to stay in power and any cost, Russia back him because they want influence in the region. America was against him, then seemingly for him and now is seemingly against him. Nobody knows what America wants, what their strategy is or whether there even is one. When nuclear powers are in close proximity, this must be a worry.
One thing I do strongly suspect: the Donald is incapable of master plans. He has a couple of tricks for manipulating the media (assert something ludicrous on the basis of no evidence, using his position of relative power to leverage action that demands it be reported on) and his supporters (basically sell them a bill of goods, the way any common snake oil salesman does). But master plans? I've never seen it. "Pathological failure" is a more apt description of him. [Insert list of Trump's failed business ventures here.] He's only president right now because the Democrats put up a historically weak candidate.

If you look at his behavior over time, it's been erratic and marked by naked opportunism. He was a Democrat, then a Republican. He was against the war on drugs, now he thinks legal, recreational weed is bad. He was for partial-birth abortions, now he's against abortion except in cases of rape, incest, and life of the mother. He was for taxing the rich and major corporations, now he's against it. In his first few months in office, he came out strong against the media, then he tried to placate them with an address before Congress in which he strove to look and sound "presidential." He endorsed and tried to ram through Congress a repeal of the main substance of the ACA which he had virtually no hand in crafting and which was even more unpopular than he is. The atmosphere of the West Wing might best be described as dismayed paranoia, and multiple respected psychologists (including Howard Gardner) have accused him of narcissism. His twitter feed is one ongoing temper tantrum without beginning or end.

Consequently, the idea that there is a master plan at work here (even assuming he did collude with the Russians to take the White House, which has yet to be proved) rings rather hollow. With how closely the FBI and Congress are looking into his and his associates' connections with the Russians, Trump would have to be not merely delusional and/or narcissistic to continue back-channel communications with them but so utterly divorced from reality that he could not even be as functional as he is.

Ultimately, this is likely just another classic Trumpian move: unplanned and unfocused in the extreme. The only real question on my mind is, "What happens now?"
plungesponge · 41-45, M
Trump is very transactional...he doesn't have the kind of personality that wants to understand how something works in deep detail. Instead he has a strong sense of what feels right (especially from a popular lay-man point of view) and his strategy is just to demand his team make it happen, without concerning himself too much with how they do it, or even if his demands are possible.

That puts the whole world in a really precarious position. On the one hand, Trump isn't exactly a psychopath, but he definitely has the capacity to blunder into something he can't talk his way out of.
Burnley123 · 41-45, M
That could well be true but equally it could be strategic.
plungesponge · 41-45, M
lol...do you really believe Trump has a deep sense of strategy? Have any of his campaign promises actually panned out the way he assured everyone he could pull it off?
SW-User
@plungesponge: it's the people around him who are more likely to be using his power in their strategy.
Putin's got Trump right where he wants him. I believe Putin has set all of this up to declare war on us while we have an idiot in office who will fall for everything! We struck Syria, and Russia can now claim we "started it". Russia will have license to go to war with the U.S.. Good thing for Russia that they installed the US president of their choice. I mean seriously. So many questions: 1. Can we have a real assessment of success of strike? Seems we didn't decimate the airbase 2. Casualties? 3. WHY DID WE WARN THE RUSSIANS? 4. And did the Russians in turn warn the Syrians? 🤔
Burnley123 · 41-45, M
Putin is not quite stupid enough to seek an outright war with NATO. He plays the strongman to deal with troubles at home but Russia has actually been reducing its military spending recently. Its not to say that there is no need to be worried but Putin is at least more predictable than Trump.
@Burnley123: I think you might be surprised at the lengths Putin will go to achieve what he wants. Putin's end game: power, oil for oligarchs, revenge for Afghanistan. All he had to do was make an idiot US president. We shall see.
RodionRomanovitch · 56-60, M
Never try and second guess an idiot , and certainly never one as capricious as Trump.
Fake, illegitimate, lying President Trainwreck has now demonstrated just how much of a LOSER he really is - not that this was ever in doubt.
Cierzo · M
When nothing is certain, the wise thing is not to use weapons.
'First shoot then ask' is still quite popular in America.
Loretta78 · 46-50, F
Sad but true. 🙄
nudistsueaz · 61-69, F
maybe it should have been done seven years ago?
MrSmooTh · 31-35, M
It's called a President not taking shit from the middle east. Hasn't been seen since Reagan.
Burnley123 · 41-45, M
Iraq and Afghanistan? 🙄
MrSmooTh · 31-35, M
@Burnley123: Bush had to go through all the bureaucracy first. Reagan was like fuck that.
Burnley123 · 41-45, M
@NoDaveParty: The destabilisation of the Iraq War is one of the main reasons why the regions is so messed up.
The only problem is who to install after Assad...
Burnley123 · 41-45, M
There are lots of problems but that is indeed one of them.
MrSmooTh · 31-35, M
Ron Jeremy?
@NoDaveParty: as long as Ron is on our side and not putins. And will fight rebels and Isis.. And not his own ppl who won't vote for him.. 😃👍
SW-User
This is what happens when a global superpower elects a weak egotist as president.
nudistsueaz · 61-69, F
your talking about the previous guy, right?
Loretta78 · 46-50, F
ajoite · 51-55, F
No idea what to make of it either given Trumps past views and relationship with Putin, very strange.
Firespirit · 26-30, M
Just the typical power play
Burnley123 · 41-45, M
Yes why now and to what end?
MrBrownstone · 46-50, M
[image deleted][image deleted]
This comment is hidden. Show Comment

 
Post Comment