Need help from other Fake Media Liberals

@Kwek00 Yep. But the red ones kill the brain cells in conservatives. So it's a balance thing.

@Ynotisay I've also noticed that since 2012 there are more red ones in the package that their used to be. I think it's turning people into communists 🤔

@Ynotisay @bijouxbroussard I see you both hearted my last post... But I do want to make it clear that this is my personal opinion. No Qanon Facebook post has backed this theory up... yet. 🤔

@CountScrofula Seriously. All this time I’ve been wearing out my shoes on picket lines and marching for [b]free[/b] ! 😳

@CountScrofula Ask windinhishair and quixotic, they both got their Escalades while I only got a lousy Prius

@CountScrofula Sorry, I have to go drop off pallets of bricks in the streets.

@SumKindaMunster
1.There is plenty of evidence that he benefited from 1992’s Black Wednesday and other banking crisis. You’re right, I haven’t contested that. What I contest is that anyone who benefits from these crisis is trying to bring about “a new world order”, if so there are many other banking crisis which he did not benefit from. So what differentiates them from those which he benefited from? Here’s a short list, just from the second half of the 20th century;
a.Secondary banking crisis of 1973–1975 in the UK
b.Japanese asset price bubble (1986–2003)
c.Savings and loan crisis of the 1980s and 1990s in the U.S.
d.1988–92 Norwegian banking crisis
e.Finnish banking crisis of 1990s
f.Swedish banking crisis (1990s)
g.Rhode Island banking crisis
h.Peruvian banking crisis of 1992
i.Venezuelan banking crisis of 1994
j.1997 Asian financial crisis
k.Enping financial crisis
l.1998 collapse of Long-Term Capital Management
m.1998 Russian financial crisis
n.Argentine economic crisis (1999–2002)
o.1998–99 Ecuador banking crisis
Even if he is guilty of everything you accuse him, how does that make him any more of a world actor than what the US has done (as a nation) in every single continent? I mean, as long as we’re talking about world order. The amount of destruction left in the wake of proxy wars with the Soviets is staggering (Vietnam, Korea, Angola, Chile, Cuba).
So now Gates is trying to better all of humankind through Vaccinations but Soros is a menacing figure because he’s funding initiatives calling for equality? Can you not see the absurdity of this position? Bill Gates…from Microsoft…tried and convicted for breaching anti-trust laws, pushing his own personal agenda, with his money which he also amassed part of through less than legal means?
And vaccines do NOT add/alter our genetic code. I will give you the benefit of doubt and assume that was a typo.
George Soros as a NAZI collaborator.
“It’s true though”
So now I guess not only were Chamberlain and Henry Ford Nazi collaborators but every person in Nazi “Work Camps” are now to be dismissed as victims and labelled “Worked for the Nazis”. I mean they could have just refused and get instantly killed. We should really analyse the 6 million Jews who died to see which ones worked for the Nazi party (even just delivering a pizza) and stop calling them victims. It’s true though…..

I have no problem with any attempt at hyperbole. I’m not having a chuckle with like minded pals, I’m having a chuckle at your expense. If George Soros is funding these protests/riots who gets the money? How can you say he is funding it if these people aren’t getting paid?
It is very well documented where his foundations money is being invested.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/07/13/us/politics/george-soros-racial-justice-organizations.html
Are they criminal groups? Is that your stance?
Furthermore how can a declaration of investment in July be considered responsible for protests which started in MAY? Does does not follow. Of course rioters use civil unrest to loot, that’s what they do no matter the cause of the unrest. Be it political or a natural disaster. It’s insane for you to dismiss the protesters and their grievances because of the rioters and looters. That’s denial. No one is defending the small minority who are violent. That would be like me saying all federal police action is criminal because of Trump’s Lafayette Square photo OP.

As for Flynn’s son. You know damn well that threatening to prosecute his son for his involvement cannot be considered a threat to his family. If you rob bank with your son and then plead guilty in return for him not being prosecuted you are in no way shape or form entitled to say you were threatened by the FBI. That’s beyond absurd. Once again who in their right mind, especially someone with so much to lose in terms of reputation would plead guilty to baseless accusations?

Nope, wrong
Portugal

@EuphoricTurtle [quote]What I contest is that anyone who benefits from these crisis is trying to bring about “a new world order”, if so there are many other banking crisis which he did not benefit from. So what differentiates them from those which he benefited from?[/quote]

The difference is that he took action to both help perpetuate and continue multiple financial crises for his own benefit. That's the difference.

[quote]Even if he is guilty of everything you accuse him, how does that make him any more of a world actor than what the US has done (as a nation) in every single continent? [/quote]

One's a person, another is a government. There is no comparison here.

[quote]So now I guess not only were Chamberlain and Henry Ford Nazi collaborators but every person in Nazi “Work Camps” are now to be dismissed as victims and labelled “Worked for the Nazis”[/quote]

None of those examples included people working by choice for the Nazis. Soros did. Again, as already mentioned he was a kid and I don't hold him accountable for it.

[quote] If George Soros is funding these protests/riots who gets the money? How can you say he is funding it if these people aren’t getting paid?[/quote] BLM and the DNC connected charity "ActBlue" get the money. It is then disseminated among democrats, democrat races, and democrat candidates.

I already stated I don't believe people are being paid directly, but you yourself have shown that he is funding these groups. The point is not him paying individual protesters, its funding partisan groups that exist to promote Democrat causes and cause divisions in the American voting populace.

[quote]It’s insane for you to dismiss the protesters and their grievances because of the rioters and looters.[/quote]

No it isn't. It's my right as an American to believe as I choose. Of course there are some good ideas in their efforts, but that is not the goal. The goal is to demoralize Trumps supporters and energize African American voters and their allies.

[quote]Furthermore how can a declaration of investment in July be considered responsible for protests which started in MAY? Does does not follow.[/quote]

Oh brother, what its not possible for them to have been funded before this time? Is that so impossible to consider?

[quote]As for Flynn’s son. You know damn well that threatening to prosecute his son for his involvement cannot be considered a threat to his family[/quote]

Like hell I do! Did YOU read the article? It said in the article this is common practice for the Feds. You are in denial, I showed you the evidence as to why Flynn pleaded guilty to protect his son. If you don't believe it, then you don't believe it.

But I have no such reservations.

Cool, Portugal. I was just inquiring.

@SumKindaMunster Once again those are unsubstantiated claims. The crisis for which he is know to have profited from, such as the 1992 British Black Wednesday as the 1997 Asian Financial Crisis we relatively short in their duration. There was no particular interest in their duration because they were all profits based on short positions. But if you have any evidence or logic pointing otherwise I would love to hear it.

As to your distinction of a person vs a government. What makes more sense in relation to bringing about a possible New World Order, a lone billionaire or a nation state with regulatory, political, financial and military power?
Please give your definition for “working by choice for the Nazis”. For me personally I would consider working by choice, if someone did so without the threat of repercussions if they chose otherwise. Something which I feel may not have been so guaranteed for a Jewish person during Nazi occupation. As for Henry Ford he continued to do business, including selling war material, with the Nazi regime until America joined the War in 1941, more than two years after the invasion of Poland. Worse of all Ford Werke employed slave laborers during the second world war BEFORE it separated from the Ford Motor Company in Dearborn Michigan. Even just as recently as 2000 Ford agreed to contribute $13 million to compensate surviving slave labourers. What does that say of Henry Ford? And if you don’t really hold Soros accountable for his work for the jewish council in occupied Nazi Hungary then why bring it up in the first place?

Onto BLM funding.
If the money doesn’t go to protesters/rioters but a fusion of BLM/DNC charities which is then disseminated among democrats, democrat races and democrat candidates then we’re right back where we started…..what is the financial incentive for all the protesters? Because that’s the conspiracy, that they are funded by George Soros, that they don’t really believe in the cause. What you’re talking about may infringe your campaign laws but that’s another matter. And now they’re Democrat causes? I thought they were his own billionaire naturalized citizen personal causes? Can you see how none of this really makes sense after two or three questions?
It is your right, not as an American but as a human being to believe whatever you want. But it is also your responsibility to not make baseless accusations based on conspiracy theories. That’s what democracy is, that’s what power is, freedom with responsibility. Freedom without responsibility or any accountability is just anarchy.
So if the goal is to demoralize Trumps supporters and energize African American voters (the fact you distinguish them speaks volumes) where is your evidence? Doesn’t it strike you as just as likely that this in fact works in his benefit? It’s the only time people don’t talk about how a pandemic is sweeping across your country killing more people in 6 months that combat soldiers in Vietnam and World War I.
As for funding before, once again we go back to baseless accusations. Where is there any shred of evidence that supports that baseless claim?
Back to Flynn

I did read the article.
Flynn’s son worked with his father in the Flynn Intel Group and WAS WITH his father on trips such as the one in December 2015 to Moscow and so had knowledge on what was discussed in those trips. He could very well been brought forward and required to testify and possibly incriminate his father or lie and face perjury charges. THAT’s what Flynn protected his son from, being brought forward to testify. And yes those are standard practices….any and everywhere in the world. It has nothing to do with believing. That’s the advantage of facts, you don’t have to just believe or wish it to be so.

@Northwest Does he pay better? Did you get an Escalade?

@independentone [quote]Does he pay better?[/quote]

Fuck yeah, and I get to use his jet skis on warm days.

[quote]Did you get an Escalade?[/quote]

He's only handing out Porsche.

@Northwest I've got to get my snowflake shit together

@QuixoticSoul Damned bureaucracy. Maybe Soros should drain the swamp.

@MistyCee and build the wall.