Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE 禄

How do you know when a Baby-trump enabler is lying?

[The Base]: "It says in Volume 1 of the report there was no collusion or obstruction justice. So, you Demorats have nothing. So, give it up already."

[Voice of Reason]: "Volume 1 of the report only addresses the systematic involvement of Russia in the 2016 election and does not address collusion or obstruction of justice... at all. Within the report, it clearly states a judgement of NO obstruction of justice committed by the President (commonly referred to as "Baby-trump") cannot be reached."

[The Base]: "You don't no the law. 馃ぃ"

[Voice of Reason]: "You didn't read the report, did you?"

[The Base]: "You can't argue with libtards. You just go around in circles and don't offer any facts."
JohnOinger41-45, M
sunsporter164970-79, M
Since when does the investigating officer presume to be the Grand Jury and decide to indict or not indict?
sunsporter164970-79, M
@GoldenWorm https://community.aarp.org/t5/Politics-Current-Events/NY-Times-Confirms-Steele-Dossier-Used-as-Justification/td-p/2163513
GoldenWorm51-55, M
@sunsporter1649 yep, it was on the list of supporting documentation. It was also used for disinformation (poorly). But, all you're doing us reminding us that Trump employed slimy morons and failed to do "extreme vetting" of his stooges.

Were you aware that we have intercepted Intel if the Russian spy handlers calling Page too stupid to work with?
sunsporter164970-79, M
@GoldenWorm LOL, supporting information my ass. Information submitted to a FISA Court must be fully vetted, and the investigating officer must attest to the validity of the evidence. Just where is the supporting documentation vetting the steele toilet paper report? Oh, that's right, pmsnbc said it was true, so it must be factual, no doubt
SW-User
you call Trump baby probably more than Melania herself lmfao
MarkPaul26-30, M
@SW-User 馃檮
MarmeeMarchM
[image deleted]
MarmeeMarchM
@GoldenWorm are you asking me ? or telling me.....
GoldenWorm51-55, M
@MarmeeMarch The mneme is just confusing since he's on the other side of the law. Better to use words.
MarmeeMarchM
@GoldenWorm not to be taken literally - just look at it at face value - not a big thing

 
Post Comment