Top | Newest First | Oldest First
anythingoes477 · M
View 20 more replies »
gol979 · 41-45, M
@anythingoes477 ad hominem and a huge case of whataboutery. Seems to me, that in your world there's your version of the truth and anyone who disagrees is uneducated, falls for propaganda pumped out by fox and infowars, poor (can't afford a book). You're displaying all the hallmarks of a rabid right winger, the very thing you get super angry about.
Personally I think both the republican party and the democratic party serve corporate interests, there's barely a cigarette paper between them. It's clearly evidenced. Small caveat, the democratic party could be a beacon for progressives, there are some good voices making themselves heard but unless there's grassroots movement to change the infrastructure of the party it is going to be in majority control of the corporations.
You're suggesting that Clinton is a woman of the people and a voice for progressives. The evidence doesn't stack up to make that conclusion.
It really doesn't matter what I say but let's try. Libya was her "baby", you can look that up but if you want I can go into that (I doubt it though). Her rhetoric during the campaign was full on aggression in relation to Syria. There's many more examples of her being a corporate shill but seems like you're just as closed off as the people you claim to despise
Personally I think both the republican party and the democratic party serve corporate interests, there's barely a cigarette paper between them. It's clearly evidenced. Small caveat, the democratic party could be a beacon for progressives, there are some good voices making themselves heard but unless there's grassroots movement to change the infrastructure of the party it is going to be in majority control of the corporations.
You're suggesting that Clinton is a woman of the people and a voice for progressives. The evidence doesn't stack up to make that conclusion.
It really doesn't matter what I say but let's try. Libya was her "baby", you can look that up but if you want I can go into that (I doubt it though). Her rhetoric during the campaign was full on aggression in relation to Syria. There's many more examples of her being a corporate shill but seems like you're just as closed off as the people you claim to despise
anythingoes477 · M
I never said, "Clinton is a woman of the people and a voice for progressives." That our Russian puppet's tactic. Pull it out of your ass as a "fact" and hope to god someone believes it. We're done here.......
[image deleted]
[image deleted]
gol979 · 41-45, M
@anythingoes477 you said she wasn't a war hawk, I just showed examples of her being exactly that. You don't refute any of my points or even discuss them, you just misinterpret my words in isolation to support your bias.
Then just quotation mark "fact" like you've given evidence of the opposite (which I would welcome) and say it's the tactics of the russians?
Then subtly and not so subtly insult me, then the good old "we're done here" and finish your rant with a meme. That is the modus operandi of the people you claim to despise.......in fact I have no idea what you're arguing for?
Then just quotation mark "fact" like you've given evidence of the opposite (which I would welcome) and say it's the tactics of the russians?
Then subtly and not so subtly insult me, then the good old "we're done here" and finish your rant with a meme. That is the modus operandi of the people you claim to despise.......in fact I have no idea what you're arguing for?
bijouxbroussard · F
Reich is [b]brilliant[/b].